OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
130429931

thanks, I've changed `level` to `level:ref` to match the local numbering system

95595326

sure, I'm not sure if there is a convention in NZ, there seems to be a mix of both approaches. If service road is more fitting feel free to change it

111314599

Hey, I wasn't sure if this one is a duplicate, since Mount Erebus has a well known elevation of 3794 but this one is 3790... https://static.topo.linz.govt.nz/maps/antarctic/tiff-300-no-logo/ME14_TIFFv1-01.tif I think you're right though, this must be a duplicate. will fix

130429931

Hi, regarding your comments, entrance=emergency is a popular tag which the iD editor has a preset for. The name of this preset is "Emergency Exit" If you think this is illogical you'd be better off starting a discussion at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema

Also my understanding is that `layer=-2` + `level=2` is valid, for buildings with strangley numbered floors:

Layer | Level
3 | 7
2 | 6
1 | 5
0 | 4 (Ground Level)
-1 | 3
-2 | 2
-3 | 1

or am I mistaken?

130335598

Hi, there's already a suburb node for Heathcote Valley (node/7745894823). Now there are two duplicates...

Maybe you should delete this node if "Heathcote" genuinely doesn't exist, or change it to another tag like place=locality if it's a recognised place, but not a suburb. A quick google search suggests that Heathcote might be an established name (e.g. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/keyword/heathcote), but I'm not sure, I'm not a local

128662711

thanks for updating it :)

128662711

Hi, you added access=no to this bridge, are you saying that the bridge is completely shut to everyone?

112055678

hey, yeah I agree landuse=meadow isn't the best tag. Nor is landuse=farmland. There was a brief discussion on the talk-nz mailing list a year ago: https://lists.osm.org/pipermail/talk-nz/2021/000309.html

If you've got ideas for how to tag them better then let's change it. Maybe `type=boundary` + `boundary=something` ?

129110314

yeah, if `motor_vehicle=destination` isn't strictly correct feel free to remove it... I would hope that routers try to avoid shared spaces by default

127038266

oh yeah it's not important in this example. just thought i'd mention why seamark:type=hulk & seamark:hulk:category is useful. the osm wiki is rather confusing when it comes to seamarks :(

127038266

sure. the downside is without a seamark tag it's invisible on nautical maps like OpenSeaMap. which is probably not a big issue in London where very few seamaps are mapped

mapping hulks with seamark tags is useful when it's overlayed with AIS data, which a good marine GPS unit would do.

e.g. https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=17&lat=-36.83445&lon=174.79524&layers=BFTFFFFFFTF0TFFFFFFFFF you can see the ferry(ies) berthed next to the 'hulk'

127038266

*nautical

127038266

if i recall correctly, the official naturical charts show it as a hulk (OBJL=HULKES) presumably with CATHLK=3

which according to seamark:hulk:category=* would translate to
seamark:type=hulk + seamark:hulk:category=museum

so i guess the AHO are tagging-for-the-renderer if it's not strictly a hulk :)

127038266

oh sorry, I thought i saw a sign that said it was permanently moored there...

126969764

sorry, thanks for fixing this

128797552

hi again. I signed up to discord but couldn't figure out how to join the oceania group...

anyway, here's a few of those junctions that I noticed. and i'm happy to change 'oneway' to 'railway:preferred_direction' as you mentioned in a different thread, if you think that's a good idea

osm.org/#map=19/-33.94190/150.94304
osm.org/#map=19/-33.94315/151.07755
osm.org/#map=19/-33.81236/151.17632
osm.org/#map=19/-33.82971/151.21428
osm.org/#map=19/-33.95666/150.87690
osm.org/#map=19/-33.71996/151.10686

128797552

cool, I'll join the discord tonight. yeah the number of exceptions to that rule confused me a bit. stuff like this: osm.org/#map=19/-33.82962/151.21377

128588163

yeah, a number of tracks already had oneway=yes so I just followed the (local) convention. Sorry if this is wrong. In europe they seem to use railway:preferred_direction instead, so I guess all the `oneway=yes` tags could be changed to `railway:preferred_direction=forward`...

128797552

Hi, sorry this is what I saw at many other interchanges around syndey (e.g. osm.org/#map=19/-33.91897/150.85298). will fix

128752151

the turn restriction looks good, nice work