❤️🔥's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 169137786 | thanks for bring this up, based on https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/51316 and https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/14912 the node further offshore is Wellington Rock, so I've removed the name from the other area |
|
| 168857761 | *applies to the section between |
|
| 168857761 | according to https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/57504, the name Te Ara-o-Tūrongo only applies to the Taumarunui and Te Awamutu, which is represented by relation/15094188 |
|
| 159631066 | okay sure, I didn't put too much thought into this. Basically I saw the dismount sign and assumed it must be a continuation of the cycleway from the south, but you gotta dismount for this final section. sooooo are there cases where highway=cycleway + bicycle=dismount would be valid? or does "dismount" imply "not a cycleway"? anyway I trust your judgement, just curious about how to interpret this |
|
| 168544593 | hey thanks for all your edits !! just an FYI that the recommended approach these days is to continue the stream line through any ponds/river areas like way/370832200 you might actually find it faster to right-click the stream's end point and then click "Continue", rather than adding every pond to the relation. both options work fine, but connecting all the river/stream lines has an added benefit since it allows us to generate watershed maps like https://waterwaymap.org/#map=6.23/-38.53/175.096 |
|
| 168032218 | i've changed it to expressway=* instead, which is designed exactly for this situation, where it doesn't quite meet the standards (see the link above for details). some OSM-based maps like OSM Americana already support this tag: https://americanamap.org/#map=13.08/-41.12254/175.03412 |
|
| 168117610 | yeah no stress, but maybe chat with some folks who use JOSM, I've seen this type of problem before, but I don't use JOSM so I can't tell ya which setting is wrong i removed that tag from changeset/168211778 & subsequent changestes |
|
| 168117610 | hey, i think your JOSM settings might be misconfigured, looks like you've added source=esri to >100,000 nodes in the past few days: see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/26Q0 and https://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=New%20Zealand where I noticed the spike I believe it's a common issue for JOSM users, but i don't know any more than that |
|
| 167686106 | sorry I forgot to reply but I did fix the building:part issues. I don't remember how much of the carpark building has shops on the ground floor, so I expanded the area to cover all of it for now |
|
| 164122088 | oh that explains the mystery, thanks ! |
|
| 166626024 | yeah that roundabout is also using the unideal method , because it was presumably drawn before the new aerial imagery was published. so eventually someone will come past here and refine it |
|
| 166626024 | Hi, the way it was previously is the correct method of mapping roundabouts. If there is a physical barrier between both side of the road, then they should be mapped as two seperate oneway lines. there's some more info here: osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway |
|
| 166282475 | Hi, what's your source for this edit? I can't find any information online about this name https://google.co.nz/search?q="POWLAB"+nz |
|
| 166476621 | hey, these should probably be highway=track + access=private, otherwise GPS software will start telling people to drive thru these private farms some more details here: highway=track |
|
| 165867501 | these roads are still open. it's a useful shortcut for walking/cycling to avoid this insane alternative route osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=-33.925775%2C151.172084%3B-33.928343%2C151.167423#map=15/-33.92614/151.17595 |
|
| 165826131 | Hi, did you survey these changes? specifically Nigel Love Bridge, it's still open as far as I can tell |
|
| 155773753 | Hi, your changeset comment doesn't match what you did in this edit. Could you please help me understand why you removed the name from the tunnel? |
|
| 155050462 | Hi, why did you delete the maintenance road? it definitely exists |
|
| 154933377 | hi, may I ask why you deleted the old Lilyvale Tunnel? it's still used by maintenance vehicles today, you can see it clearly from the train |
|
| 166005016 | hi, if there's a new address, could you please create a new point, instead of repurposing an existing point and dragging it far away? thanks ! |