Hi, in the future could you please use a more helpful changeset comment? See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I see that you removed the name, has this company moved elsewhere? And if so, do you know who uses this factory now?

Hi, marking a building as demolished is somewhat complicated, what you need to do is open the "Tags" section and manually change "building" to "demolished:building" , see https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11ee4ef7-3698-4ac9-b19b-f9ed95faa7d7

ah sorry, thought i fixed my discord notifications but evidently not 😆 let's discuss it over there

> "Many were incorrectly labelled as SI_xxxx"

Well, that's what the signs say. So they shouldn't be deleted since they do exist and do have this exact wording printed on them.

railway:signal:*:form=sign indicates that this is a static sign rather than a light.

If some yellow signs have a different purpose, you can indicate that with railway:signal:*:function - see osm.wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging

> "The resources are public. [...] I'm not sure why we couldn't use them."

Unlike wikipedia, we can't just use copyrighted information, we need explicit permission. See osm.wiki/Copyright and osm.wiki/Contributors#Australia for a list of australian sources. If you want to use this information, you would need to email the company to get explicit consent

sure, fixed

thanks for the heads up, i've left a comment to ask about this

Hi, could you please help me understand why you deleted some of these signs? They still exist, I saw them last week while surveying the switch refs.

I'm also don't think we have permission to use the resources that you linked to....

oops, thanks for fixing it. There is work underway at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1538 to make iD warn users about errors like this

Hi, please have a look at the comments here: changeset/169584545

I see that all these nodes are along the dividing line between the Waitematā and Ōkura River watershed areas, so are you adding these becaue some software requires it?

hey, this was all automated, since we have permission to use their data (osm.wiki/Contributors#New_Zealand ). So it took about 5minutes to run the script and double check the result.

if you know any programming languages like Python or JavaScript, Level0 is an easy way to upload the results from your own script

done, to match the more common approach in NZ: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28i6

hi, could you please explain a bit more about this change? Tristram Ave has significantly higher traffic volumes than the road through Milford, so how come you inverted the road classifications?

but it's not possible to go straight ahead at this intersection ?

hey, the problem with access=destination is that it's now impossible to access sylvia park train station using navigation software. Any objection if i remove that tag from the main access road? since you are allowed to drive to the train station to drop someone off, or walk/cycle to the train station

heya, when I mapped this a year ago, there was a huge construction program underway to widen Memorial Ave, which seemed to be finished when I went past last week.

The little construction area between Old Windsor Road and the T-Way can be changed back to landuse=grass (confirmed last week). I assume the west side can too, but I havent surveyed this myself

(leaving a comment for extra visibility) this seems very dubious, it's clearly marked as helipad, but maybe it's a joke from the landowner?

hey again, i think the normal approach is to add the name to the landuse=retail area - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28i6 for similar examples around NZ or way/354967893 for a local example

hey, are you refering to the Great Taste Trail? There are already two relations for this trail : relation/2656812 and relation/11589483

so you just need to add wikidata=Q135422429 to one of the existing relations, no need to create new one. Then after a day or two Template:Maplink should work

sorry for the confusion, i removed abandoned=yes so it's less confusing. To clarify, it's 'abandoned' in the sense that the 6-lane road is no longer a busy highway, but it's still open to the public and there are spray-painted carpark markings:

https://0x0.st/8dkc.jpg

hey, is node/13011393177 intentionally different from node/9012940607 which seems to refer to the same wikipedia article? i'm not a local, just wanted to double check. seems like it would be better to fix the name on node/9012940607 instead