❤️🔥's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161620402 | not your fault. thanks for tidying this up. most of this stuff was mapped 8 years ago when there was no hi-res imagery |
|
| 146843267 | perfect, thanks for updating these :) |
|
| 150904660 | sounds good, man_made=tunnel is the only other opinion I can think of , but its also not perfect |
|
| 161552356 | thanks for the quick response, I think the notes are confused since there are 3 similar ones at this location. I've restored the bus stop for now |
|
| 160966771 | Hi, you have been setting the 'operator' tag on many businesses to values that could potentially be peoples' names. Could you please confirm that this data is not private information? OpenStreetMap is a public database; please see osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information for further info |
|
| 161552356 | Hi, what source did you use for this edit? (apart from the osm note) Every transit app that I checked shows that this stop still exists and the 324 bus stops here |
|
| 159981057 | hey, you can check https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/50772 to see the exact extent of the 'Defence Purpose' land |
|
| 160735720 | sorry no one replied to this, what you've done with relation/17011117 is perfect. In OSM, the relation just needs a wikidata ID. Wikidata itself does not need to be updated. Then after a few days you can add {{Maplink|frame=yes|https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:type=line}} to the wikipedia page, and the relation will magically appear. |
|
| 161257491 | done: node/8294953574 it's a bit confusing because waterfalls are only allowed as vertices, not standalone points. So the editor won't let you plonk a waterfall anywhere, you have to first select a point along a stream/river |
|
| 160811592 | Hi, why are you removing tags like tracktype ? |
|
| 159307907 | Does this circlular feature exist in reality? It seems to duplicate node/12346604162 |
|
| 161139710 | Hi, several people have asked you to stop deleting precicely mapped landuse. See changeset/110602955 and changeset/128320877 and changeset/128750531 May I ask why you've started deleting other people's work again? I see you were doing this last year as well... |
|
| 115923904 | on that topic, I see you've added two bays called Island Bay, do you know which one is correct? |
|
| 115923904 | according to the NZGB, Te Motu Tohorā is the other island: https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/55500 this island has no recorded name in the NZGB |
|
| 152747580 | hmm that's really weird, thanks for fixing it. no idea how it happened... |
|
| 160385268 | I just found out that this area will be returned to its original dilapidated state after the event finishes......... so maybe it wasn't worth mapping the construction |
|
| 156773988 | cool thanks for the detailed explanation, feel free to make any changes you need , apologies again for the inconvenience |
|
| 156773988 | hey, my apologies, previously most ferry routes were just set to Wharf 5 which wasn't correct either... So in this changeset I moved the ferry routes to their usual* wharfs, rather than Wharf 5. and also cleaning up and deleting very old data (e.g. the F4 doesn't go to Rose Bay anymore, F7 and F9 were mixed up, MFF route was broken, etc) but unfortunately OSM's data model for PTv2 routes requires you to pick an arbitrary platform/wharf, so it can never be perfectly modelled... are there any specific things that need to be fixed to help TfNSW's use case? |
|
| 158603019 | Hi, cars are allowed to drive here if they're accessing the Sydney Water carpark |
|
| 158111713 | Hi, there's a sidewalk on this bridge.... Are you sure you edited the correct feature? |