hey, way/1350825473 has no tags, do you remember what this line was supposed to be?

sure, that seems like a reasonable assumption. Any thoughts on changeset/162928844 ? The 3 weird ones are all related to the Tidal Flow System (TFS) so in that case I think =traffic_control is fine?

I'll add those to the wiki once I get photos

thanks for your edits, are you mapping the curve speeds or just the line speed? I've added an inconsistent mix of both in auckland, still not sure what the best approach is

got it, thanks for fixing this

hmm weird, I've opened a note to follow up on this: note/4614501

hey, there are some inconsistent speed limits around way/230525503 now, do you know what the correct value should be? Looks like it's 30: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=8f0287bd-bf30-445b-8965-bfefb700de5c&cp=-36.861905~174.771079&lvl=17&dir=11.019222&pi=0.0022026114&style=x&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

Hi, if you're going around and removing deprecated tags, I suggest removing all at once; attribution and source_ref are also considered obsolete

Hi, could you please explain a bit more about this edit; what is this number supposed to mean?

no worries, then I'll add a fixme tag so there's some information for anyone who runs into it

fixed in changeset/161935139

sorry about this... the Level0 editor has a limit of 500 features per edit, so it looks like the editor lost all my changes except the first 500 nodes 🤦 I've cleaned this up now in changeset/161934838

hey, way/1333424683 still has no tags, do you remember what this was supposed to be?

no worries, I can check it with an automated script next week, which will be a lot more efficient

See https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/7780

Q5617739 was the correct ID until 2023 when that ID was repurposed.

It's a bit annoying, but apparently spliting by country is required for https://alltheplaces.xyz

re. second and third comments: "weren't worth realigning" is a tricky topic, I also find the validator warnings annoying, but deleting them causes further issues, for example disconnected segments of waterways. https://waterwaymap.org is normally a nice way to visualize this.

I quite like the approach you've done in subsequent changesets, I would suggest that method going forward

re. your first question: your changeset is too big to use any of the standard tools, unfortunately the only method I know is manually clicking on the ways listed below this chatbox

nice to hear that you've been in touch in Bryan, I think there's an update coming soon to Rapid's crossing validator. but unfortunately it'll take a lot longer to get these features into iD...

Hi, I checked 20 of the deleted ways and they all seem to exist.... Some of them have also been refined by other mappers since the original import.

If the creekbed appears dry, that might be because the aerial imagery was caputered in summer, and it would be more appropriate to add intermittent=yes instead of deleting it

okay, maybe it's fine as is. It felt a bit weird, but I guess having a direction makes sense

should we also add oneway=no ? iD assumes that waterway=flowline implies oneway=yes: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/10283 but these are all tidal bays