I'd hope that by next summer the construction here will be finished, but who knows. I guess we can decide in 5 months when it closes

good point, thanks for fixing it andrew. I'll check the signage next time I walk past, in case there's more accurate dates

Hi, please don't ignore validator warnings. And may I ask why you deleted part of the defence area?

awesome thanks :)

Hi, did you intentionally remove Goat Island from the Port Jackson relation? See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/15522136

The result is that the island appears underwater

Hi, if you're going to merge address nodes with buildings, it's much more efficient to hold down `Shift`, then click on the node & the building, and then press `C` on your keyboard

This also prevents existing tags from being deleted, like addr:suburb

I think the wording on priority=* just needs to be fixed to match the other wiki pages. oneway=alternating is a well established tag and it's used on over 2000 one-lane-bridges

you're right that the literal meaning of the word 'oneway' seems wrong, but this is a common problem in OSM, see here for more info: osm.wiki/Counterintuitive_keys_and_values

Hi, why is oneway=alternating "incorrect"? This seems like a perfect example of oneway=alternating according to the documentation: oneway=alternating

Hi, merging 22 and 22A into the same building is less precise than having two nodes in the exact location.

If you know the exact boundary between the two units, then you could split the building area, e.g. way/1316654484

Hi, if you're going to merge address nodes with buildings, it's much more efficient to hold down `Shift`, then click on the node & the building, and then press `C` on your keyboard

This also prevents existing tags from being deleted

this was also discussed in note/3518823 , it's now fixed

Hi, it seems like you've created a traffic signal here, which I assume is unintentional. Perhaps you could explain a bit more about about what you're trying to change?

sorry about that..... thanks @fortera_au for fixing it already, I'll try to be more careful in the future 🙊

the new west auckland imagery is a bit offset and certainly lower resolution, so "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" is still the best source for aligning features. and I think bing is somewhere inbetween those two

last week LINZ released new aerial imagery for West Auckland and Central Auckland :) but it may take several months before these layers are available in the official version of the iD editor

Hi, you may want to checkout the 2024 aerial imagery, some of the buildings you mapped have been demolished and there is a new access road here: https://kyle.kiwi/iD/#background=LINZ_Auckland_West_2024&map=19.60/-36.78436/174.62203

done, relation/15058659 now includes this island too

thanks for the info, I've marked the shop as closed

should be fixed now, not sure how this edit affected the stop order

Hi, please don't ignore validator warnings, there are a huge number of issues that now need to be fixed...