Dear M0nty_013, thank you for your contributions. You have added house numbers in different regions. Please specify your source for these additions, and if the source is not a survey that you have undertaken, please ensure that any external sources you have used are not subject to copyright.

Dear aardalperr, many of the buildings you have added in this changeset have some quality issues, they are often not squared (the hotkey "Q" will square it for you), and they sometimes overlap other buildings! The editor will show warnings in these cases but it appears you have ignored these warnings.

Please be more careful in the future. Also, please write a changeset description that other people can understand - not "." as you did in this changeset.

When you change road classifications, please leave a short rationale. In this changeset you have upgraded many roads to "tertiary" which in my view only serve a couple dozen properties and which would clearly be residential where I live.

Please explain where on the cited source https://www.amarillo.gov/safe-streets I can find information about the proposed roundabout between Pecos St/SW 15th Av that you have entered in this changeset.

Dear someone123457, please clarify where on the cited source "www.amarillo.gov/safe-streets" I can find the proposed highway way/1296582908

Der Spruch "Nie wieder!" wird oft verwendet, wenn es um den Holocaust geht. In diesem Changeset hast Du aber zuerst gegen "religiösen Extremismus" gewettert. Falls das nicht klar ist: Diejenigen, die den Holocaust zu verantworten haben, haben kein Halal-Fleisch gegessen.

Fest steht: Wenn man in OSM einträgt, ob eine Fleischerei koschere oder halale oder vegane Produkte anbietet, dann ist das nicht "religiöser Extremismus", und wenn jemand - wie Du hier - das dennoch behauptet, dann ist das im *besten* Fall ein Missverständnis, für das er sich entschuldigen sollte. Alle anderen denkbaren Motivationen sind schlechter.

Falscher Hashtag im Changeset. Richtig ist DWG Ticket#2024070510000254

I see you're doing this a lot. Please pause multipoligonizing single-way islands until we have established why this is deemed necessary.

Ah right, I see NNG is the company you work for. But still... I think that this edit was unnecessary. What was the QA complaint?

Could you explain what the added value is in creating one-member multipolygons for these islands? What does #nng stand for?

Guter Punkt. Die Straßenschilder sollen laut Schreiben am 23.8. enthüllt werden, ab 14:00 gibt es an dem Tag eine Veranstaltung auf dem Mnaga-Bell-Platz. Der Teil zwischen Müllerstraße und Manga-Bell-Platz soll in "Anna-Mungunda-Allee" umbenannt werden, das stand in einem zweiten Schreiben, das ich übersehen hatte. Ich mache das gleich.

Please provide evidence that construction has begun, and please cite a source for the street names used here (as they are unlikely to be signposted at this stage).

osm.org/user_blocks/16513

osm.org/user_blocks/16513

osm.org/user_blocks/16513

osm.org/user_blocks/16513

How have you managed to capture house numbers from the quoted source "Esri World Imagery"?

Hello there, in this changeset you introduced - among other things - a highway named "B6443" which according to available imagery seems to cross straight across farmland in many places. Were you aware that these changes are uploaded to the global map used by everybody else - or did you attempt to create a "private" map for your own use? If the latter, the method you have chosen was unsuitable; have a look at umap.openstreetmap.fr which lets you "scribble" onto an OSM background and generate private maps. I will remove your edits from OSM now to avoid confusion, though if it turns out that some are worth keeping we can re-instate them later. Cheers, Frederik (DWG Ticket Ticket#2024072710000187 )

In this changeset you have mapped a rectangular roof of a few square feet as a 6-member multipolygon: relation/17854639. Can you explain the reasoning behind that? It seems overly complex and will likely put anyone else off touching that building...

Dear dmr090909, please stop creating military areas with a name tag of "currently controlled by X". The name tag is for the name only, and not for a description of who controls it. This information can go into other tags - provided that the areas in question are actually "military landuse" at all.