Happy to revert this with my DWG hat on, however, let's give the original importer a chance to reply first. Maybe there *has* been a discussion and we just haven't seen it, and maybe examples of damage are few and far between?

opencarpatia, please stop spamming every one of this user's changesets with 2-month old grievances.

We all want the best map. But what I am seeing is people ganging up against one particular user, and finding fault in everything that user does, even if it would be totally fine for someone else to make the same edit. That is what I don't like. An edit does not become a bad edit because it is made by user X - an edit is either good or bad in itself.

I would like to understand what "error" in way/881574242 was fixed in this changeset?

hossein132, can you explain how changing a primary road into an alleyway is "accurate and credible"? I wonder if this might be a language issue - do you know what a "service road" and an "alleyway" are?

jeslop, please stop following the user GonVid around and touching every single object they have edited. This is not nice. For example, way/296094318 has been landuse=cemetery for over 6 years and nobody had a problem with it. Then GonVid adds a name:es tag which didn't hurt, and then you come along saying "Corrección errores" and you change it to amenity=grave_yard. There is no reason for that, same with your edit to way/619762345. It is ok to fix a real error made by another mapper, but it is not ok to follow them around and apply some extra touches to every single object the edit.

Dear user Gelino, please try to use good changeset comments (osm.wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios) on your edits as a gesture of respect towards your colleagues. Thank you!

In this changeset you have removed the name:uk tags from a street. Please be careful with that in the future; even if the predominant name should be Russian the alternative Ukrainian name must not be deleted.

nevw, are you sure - natural=wood was, I thought, reserved for unmanaged forests which a group of trees in a city is certainly not...

The correct way is to follow the guidelines outlined in the link. Most importantly, you need to discuss your process with the community on a suitable mailing list - the tagging list probably if you plan a world-wide edit or maybe just a country-wide list for country-wide edits. You must explain what you intend to do, which objects you will pick out and how you intend to change them. So that others can point out potential flaws in your logic that might cause damage.

Hello 30d4f4e1ccf24, could you explain what mapping technique you have used here? This changeset created 190 nodes but not the way joining them; that way was added later. It would be very difficult to achieve that result with JOSM (though not impossible).

In this changeset you have changed one "Circle K" store to "disused" and you used the changeset comment "update brand" which doesn't capture the most important change. Also, there is a second "Circle K" just a few metres away. Did you not see that when you looked at the area you were editing?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/95248959 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous boundary edits

Why have you removed a legitimate name:en tag in this changeset? Please be more careful when applying the reverter plugin.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/95244982.

This edit broke the coastline of island 24958480. Can you explain why you performed the edit and what you wanted to achieve? The text "." as a changeset comment unfortunately tells us little.

Dear localbirder, I came across this edit because you had accidentally "opened" the coastline which led to the flooding of a large part of the continental US. I fixed that now, and in doing so encountered a number of other smaller problems that arose from your editing, like cart paths folding back onto themselves or overlapping each other, overlapping buildings and so on. If your editor makes you aware of these problems, maybe worth having a look!

This changeset has reversed the line direction of the coastline surrounding the Caspian Sea, thereby breaking it. Can you explain why you did that?

Dear user mahmoudabadi_fm, please try to use good changeset comments that describe what you edited and possibly why. "this change needed" is not a good changeset comment. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for an explanation. If you do not feel confident writing a good changeset comment in English, then writing it in Persian is absolutely fine!

Also um da jedes Missverständnis auszuschliessen: Du, BeKri, hast jede einzelne dieser Hausnummern selbst in Augenschein genommen und garantiert nicht aus irgendeiner Quelle abgezeichnet, das ist Deine Aussage, ja? Und es ist definitiv nicht möglich, dass Du eine Hausnummer eingetragen hast, wo in Wahrheit nur eine Wiese ist, ja?