Solche Daten, die für OSM wegen mangelnder Konstanz, Relevanz oder Überprüfbarkeit ungeeignet sind, könnte man z.B. auf einer "Umap" (umap.openstreetmap.de) einzeichnen, wenn man eine "Betriebsgebiet-Karte" machen will.

In this changeset you added a (somewhat "over-noded") golf cart path 794337967 and tagged it as a "service road". Can you explain how it came to that. Is there any indication of this path being used to perform deliveries, or why did you choose to add it?

Hello MenKauRa, it would be extremely helpful if you could use changeset comments that describe the work you have done, instead of simply writing the date and hour of the edit! See osm.wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments for more information

Das wäre besser. Das disused=yes wird auch als "Überraschungs-Tagging" bezeichnet: ah, es ist eine Landebahn (aeroway=runway). oh, es ist doch keine (disused=yes). Daher sind wir auch von z.b. highway=motorway+construction=yes auf highway=construction+construction=motorway umgestiegen und so weiter - um die leute nicht zu verwirren, die nicht ganz genau hin schauen!

Hallo Sascha, nach meinen Informationen ist die 10(28 ausser Betrieb und darf selbst von solchen Flugzeugen, denen die Länge ausreichen würde, nicht mehr für Starts oder Landungen genutzt werden. Wenn das so ist, dann soltle way/736582192 *nicht* mehr als "runway" gekennzeichnet sein, oder?

Hallo Bekri, eine passendere Antwort wäre gewesen: "Ich habe diese Adressen selbst erfasst. Darf ich fragen, wieso meine Beiträge die Aufmerksamkeit von jemandem erregen, der seit 2018-11-02 keine Änderungen vorgenommen hat?" -- Gleiche Message, ohne zu beleidigen ("Kasperl", "dumme Kommentare"). Die Frage nach der Datenquelle ist in OSM eigentlich immer berechtigt. Du hast ja nicht "source=survey" hingeschrieben, um die Antwort vorwegzunehmen.

Hello Le Mago, I would like to learn about the process you have used to create relations like relation/10541827 - this is a big forest multipolygon with many holes in it, but these holes do not correspond to e.g. a road going though the forest (https://imgur.com/a/Xzniecg). I see the same pattern of more or less arbitrary holes in polygons in many other of your landuse edits. Can you clarify?

Thank you for the explanation. Please stop doing that (adding rule-based transliterations for places that don't actually have a name in that language). It has the capacity to tremendously inflate OSM's database without real value added. (What's to stop someone else applying the same rules to, say, every single street in New York City?) -- See also: osm.wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration

Hi, what is your source for these Macedonian names in Liechtenstein? Are you sure these towns and villages really *have* Macedonian names?

See discussion on tagging mailing list.

See discussion on tagging list.

Please see discussion on tagging list.

I have hidden two URLs from this comment thread that were accidentally published by Wilco_VR_IJsselland but not meant for public consumption.

Hello Gabriel0322, not everything where a pedestrian can walk is a footpath. Much as pedestrians can cross a meadow anywhere they like, they can also traverse a graveyard. Don't try to record all these options as footways please.

Dear ziedellouze, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. In this upload you have added a pharmacy POI and a pharmacy building. On the map this now looks like TWO pharmacies ;) next time, one is enough - either a POI or a building. Also, you have marked one of them with "dispensing=no" and one with "dispensing=yes". Perhaps you can correct that?

(automatic translation:)
Cher ziedellouze, bienvenue à OSM et merci pour votre contribution. Dans ce téléchargement, vous avez ajouté un POI de pharmacie et un bâtiment de pharmacie. Sur la carte, cela ressemble maintenant à DEUX pharmacies;) la prochaine fois, une seule suffit - soit un POI ou un bâtiment. De plus, vous avez marqué l'un d'eux avec "dispensing=no" et un avec "dispensing = yes". Peut-être pouvez-vous corriger cela?

nikospag, you write "The old sections of EO2 must have old_ref=ΕΟ2 and be renamed according to local destinations." - is this a rule that comes from the Greek government or a custom among the Greek community? How does one determine *which* local destinations to use in naming a road?

In this changeset you changed way/690332491 from "trunk" to "primary" even though a note on that way said "when the new highway is built this changes to primary" - and the new highway is apparently not yet build. What is the basis for your downgrading this way to "primary"?

In this changeset you have removed the "nat_ref=EO38" tag from way/698292408. Can you explain in how far this is "community consensus"; is the problem with nat_ref or does the community say EO38 is elsewhere or what is the issue?

Can I see the official document that says that the street depicted by way/655441474 is officially called "Πτολεμαίδας - Φλώρινας"?

Dear Rick Sanchez, it appears that you have another perception of what "reflects reality" than other members of the Greek community. It would be desirable to find a consensus here, potentially by participating in forum discussions here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27 - please refrain from changing the names or "ref" tags of roads before such consensus has been achieved.