Yes, that is ok - but the AL7 in this area have been damaged. Because the new members have not been added to the old al7.

Hi Amin,

adding boundaries is fine - but you should not distroy other boundaries by your work.

please download the full area before adding boundaries. workink with uncomplete datasets will create a lot of trouble.

see https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1458-countries-compare-2018-12-31 for a list of damaged boundaries :(

two mappers spent more than 2 hours to fix that.

walter/germany

thanks.

Hi Hornissen,

WENN die bebaute Fläche als Siedlung einen Namen hat ("Dichterviertel", "Blumensiedlung", ...), dann KANN man dafür einzelne Residential anlegen und mit dem Siedlungsnamen versehen.

Bei Gewergegebieten ist das i.d.R der Fall.

Ortsnamen oder auch Stadteilnamen an Residential gehen gar nicht, da damit nur Teilflächen ohne zugehörige Randflächen benannt werden.

walter

ps: im Forum wird das derzeit heftig diskutiert. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=731597#p731597

Hi Max,

i'm beware of census "boundaries" and usually i don't convert them to admin boundaries any more. may be i did something like that last year (2017) or earlier. can you give me an example? rel-id?

and yes, Mount Vernon is really strange. IIRC this area including Fort Belvoir was a mesh - overlapping, redundant and missing bounday segments everywhere. i was not able to fix that area - and i'm still not. Sorry for that.

walter

Hi, I don't think, this boundary is ok - but i can't fix it :(

may be you can fix that?

https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/marion_usa.png

"Multipolygonlinien überschneiden sich" --> "Overlapping multipolygon lines"

Regards
walter/Germany

good to know, thanks

sorry for that. has been restored.

but why are there two exact the same boundaries for Anadindeua?

One with AL8 relation/185610 and one with AL9 relation/6428391? I think, one of then has to go.

walter

Great :)

have a nice day, happy christmas and a good new year.

walter

Hi Poliakoff, which user are you talking to? And which CS did you revert?

btw: i did not change anything here, i just asked a question.

regards
walter

Hi, das war leider nix mit "korrigiert". Du hast die Grenze von Lage(9) gelöscht. Ist sicher ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler, schau also bitte nochmal drüber

Gruss
walter

see https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/angola.png

Hi Bengo and Luanda are still missing/incomplete/wrong. Please fix that.

Regards
walter, Germany

Moin, schlechte Laune? Das sollte ein Wortspiel sein ;)

Danke für's Anpassen.

Schiebung!!!

Gerne. brauchst nur hier zu gugge: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1412-countries-compare-2018-11-13

jeden Mittag ne neue Liste. Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 (immer ganz am Ende) oder als RSS-Feed: https://wambachers-osm.website/rss/Missing_Boundaries.rss

Gruss
walter

1 Grenze war put, wurde aber bereits von Kollegen gefixt.

morgen seh ich, ob du dabei "meine" Boundaries geschreddert hast ;)

Gruss
walter

STOP THAT. Removin "unnessesary" tags will kill that boundary. and type=land_area is wrong too.

the "is_in" tags, "source" tag and "tiger" tags are not being used any more. from my point of view, it's ok to remove those tags.