Hi. please never ever change international boundaries without discussion. This will allways lead to problems.

and: you not enly moved that disputed area, you did it wrong too.

see: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/981-countries-compare-2017-08-05

all missing and changes boundaries on FRA and ITA are result of your sloppy work :(

i reverted that "fixes" and will wait for any discussion with the international community.

walter/germany

indian community of course. and wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India#Subdivisions

you may see discussion here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=657562#p657562

hi,
please stop those changes. This area is CONTROLLED by India and CLAIMED by China.It is not ok to change that area.

This political motivated edit will be reverted asap.

The Data Working Group (DWG) is watching your activities and you will be blocked if you keep on doing that stuff.

hi,
please stop those changes. This area is CONTROLLED by India and CLAIMED by China.It is not ok to change that area.

This political motivated edit will be reverted asap.

The Data Working Group (DWG) is watching your activities and you will be blocked if you keep on doing that stuff.

Something like that I had expected. I was not quite sure.

btw: you should switch to JOSM - iD is not made for relations. You are mapping since 2008 (me 2009) and using iD? no good ;(

Regards
walter, germany

WHY did you remove mostly all ways from this boundaries? they are like ruins without walls.

walter

Aber hallo! So geht es nicht weiter. Ich habe die Data Working Group verständigt und um eine Sperre deines Accounts gebeten.

Hi,
bitte lass diese wertenden Namen sein!
Diese wurden und werden sofort aus OSM entfernt, da sie nicht unseren Vorstellungen von korrekten Angaben entsprechen.
Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59090 wo du dich bei bedarf äußern magst.

walter

not right: iD uses browser but JOSM does not.

JOSM does: download data to local system/edit local/upload changes only to osm

that is much less traffic than iD.

btw: iD is making many problems on complex relations (e.g. boundaries). ok, just changing tags it's doing well - i hope.

But if you change the geometry, iD will often fail. You will not see it, but sometimes relations are broken.

hi,

your last ~10 changesets were OK :)

If you think, that is a technical problem, you should change the editor. iD is "for beginners only". complex edits like changing relations should be done by JOSM, which is much more stable and desingned for "professional use". In a long term, josm will be the better choice for you (and osm :))

regards
walter

Sorry, can't beleave you :(

there are no know problems with poor internet connections. And never ever does a bad line change tags (e.g type=boundary to type=site for ukraine)

Andy from DWG told me, that he contacted you too because of other strange edits :(

please try to do a good job.

regards, walter / germany

Just checked the list:

https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/958-countries-compare-2017-07-13

All missing boundaries with admin level are "result" of your work. You even changed Ukraine to type=site, which is vandalism.

I'll contact Data Working Group and we will check your next edits very, very carefully.

walter

Hi, i'm not shure if your changes of name:zh are ok,

BUT NEVER EVER remove boundary=administrative from any admin boundary!
You did this for Belarus and Falkland Islands in this changeset.
Please work more carefull.

Regards
walter

Fixes:
changeset/50254951

changeset/50255079

Hi sophie,

never ever remote type=* from any relation. that is mandatory!

and don't remove boundary=administrative from any boundary relation.

thats is completely wrong.

fixed: changeset/50171915

regards, walter

Hi Sophie, please do nor remove type=* from any relation and never ever remove type=boundary from boundary relations. that is mandantory.

regards
walter

Hi,

never ever remove type=boundary from a boundary relation. you will "kill" this area.

and please use meanungfull changeset comments. otherwise you will be blocked.

btw: changing relations with iD is no good way. iD s not made for that. switch to josm, to get professional.

Hi,
what are you doing?

are there no more suburbs (parts of cities with al9) any more?

talking of relation/5808104/history

btw: a relation without any tags is meaningless and wrong. otherwise delete this relation too.

walter

please DO NEVER EVER remove type=boundary from boundary relations. This tag is very important to osm.

hi, landuse=farm is obsolete.
josm did tell you, but you ignored :(