For future reference, the note mentioned in the changeset comment is note/4030552.

Sim, exatamente :)

Hi FasterTracker. Please note that the "species" key is supposed to take the full binomial designation of the organism. So instead of `genus=Olea` + `species=europaea`, it should be simply `species=Olea europaea`, and so on.

Yes, you're right, sorry. FWIW, I did that in my next changesets where I fixed the nodes for the capital cities.

For the time being, I removed the tree_lined tag from this area (changeset/163362734), because it is a non-linear feature and the meaning of the tag is ambiguous in this case (especially since there are individually mapped trees in its vicinity, that are in no way forming a line along its perimeter).

DanielAgos, since (1) this is a significant change covering a large area, and (2) it was discussed extensively in the OSM Telegram channel, it would have helped to mention that fact (the discussion and consensus) in the changeset comment, just to make it more reassuring to other editors that the edit is correct and well sourced. In fact, a link to a news or official source would have been nice too.

Cool, thanks for the update!

Nice! I'm glad it got cleared up and all fixed now. Cheers!

Hi Ingbife — I noticed that you added `denotation=garden051_areal_bayerischer_bahnhof` to some trees in this edit. Did you perhaps mean `denotation=garden`?

Hi Domijtri. I noticed that you added some trees in this edit with `denotation=cemetery` while others were added with `denotation=cemeterybaronvoms2`. Was it a typo of some sort? Can they be changed to `cemetery` as well?

Hey SekeRob, can you clarify what you meant by "denotation=deù" in the trees added in this edit?

No worries! That's the wiki way ;)

Hi there. Why did you add "Tilia sp." as the value of the species tag? That designation doesn't specify any species; instead it literally means "an unspecified species of the genus Tilia", and these trees already have genus=Tilia. Am I missing something?

Why did delete individual trees and replace them with tree_row instead? That destroys information about how many trees there are, and their location, and also prevents addition of tree-specific information (height, diameter, species, etc.)

Oh, desculpa! Escapou-me completamente esta nota. Corrigi agora no changeset/161258870.

Hi there! Can you explain the reasoning for removing the genus and species tags in this edit?

Great! I have now added the species tag again (it had been removed without explanation by user_5589) with the value "Aesculus hippocastanum". Cheers!

Hi Tuiui! In this changeset you added a tree with designation "Acer hippocastanum", but that doesn't seem to be a valid species name. Did you perhaps mean "Aesculus hippocastanum" instead?

Hey Martinus123! In this changeset you added "species = hippocastanum" to this tree, but the genus remained as "Quercus". "Quercus hippocastanum" is not a valid binomial designation. Can you please confirm which should be the right species name for this tree?

Hello, fathima! In this changeset you added several trees with designation "Platanus hippocastanum", but that doesn't seem to be a valid species name. Did you perhaps mean "Aesculus hippocastanum" instead?