The source information is not correct: you cannot use OpenStreetMap as source for OpenStreetMap data

This changeset contains a large number of wrong riverbank geometries: too large and connceting in some places unconnected crossing waterways. I suggest a complete revert and restart from scratch.

Perché hai tolto i nomi del Canale Scaricatore e San Gregorio?

Thanks - corrected

Thanks!

This changeset contains a large number of trees that do not correspond to real objects on the grounds (example node/2508848737
which is part of a road-side tree-row, but only about one-in-three is in the data,). I Please consider reverting the trees from this import.

Hi,
in this changeset you seem to have tagged many or all building vertices with building=yes, in addition to the tag building=yes on the closed way that represents the whole building. This in not correct, the vertices are not buildings, they are only part of a closed way that represents a building. You should remove all tags building=yes from nodes that are building vertices. There are some 4500 of these nodes - see
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yHB
If you have problems removing them yourself, please contact me via OSM

Where did you get the street name from? "Via Sambin" is not on Bing aerial imagery.

What's the data source for this planned road?

... and node/1323976715 looks more like histroric=wayside_shrin

Please do not add highway=road. Please check the Imagery available in the area and pick the correct highway value.

Please ignore my question - I have now looked at the history - my fault.

What is the source of these data, They are not visible in any of the usual background maps in ID?

Thanks for pointing this out. Corrected.

Of the three roundabouts only one has been implemented so far. But also this is in the wrong position. Also the changeset source is wrong as obviosly the Bing Satellite photos do not show the not-yet-existing roundabouts.
Please revert this changeset. The map should not contain non-existing features. You can add features under consruction with the appropriate tagging, provided you have construction details with an OSM compatible license.

corrected (and a number of similar errors elsewher). Thanks for spotting this.

Faccio riferimento a una serie di shape present in OSM da quattro anni, ma non ancora taggati, Sono tutti con "area=yes" e un tag del tipo "fixme=Import CTR Veneto. Isolato. Usare landuse idoneo es. landuse=residential". In alcuni (rari) casi hanno bordi in comune con edifici importati e già taggati. Combaciano. Lo spostamento è di circa 3m NNW nella zona dove mi muovo adesso (Eraclea - San Donà). Vorrei dare l'allarme prima dell'importazione definitiva. Ovviamente anche tutti gli edifici già visibili sarebbero da spostare, come ho già sottolineato in tante occasioni.

Questi shape non ancora utilizzate sono spostati sistematicamente in confronto a tracce GPX e PCN2006

Please correct retaining_wall tag directions as appropriate, or remove them all together

Hi Brandon, you replaced the street name with the name of the running trail that runs along this street. If the running trail is trailblazed you should use a running route relation to represent it, but not change the name of the street. See osm.wiki/Relation:route
If you need help doing this, please contact me via OSM.