Hello, sorry, I think that the name of the relation (which is Via ferrata "Fausto Susatti") is little bit confusing. Thats probably why I made this mistake. So sorry again.

I reverted the change here:
changeset/172424752

I changed them to highway=proposed. Thanks for clarification.
BR

Hello, I just edited the geometry of the tunnel itself. And I have also seen photos of the tunnel under construction. Or do you mean the roundabouts?

Hi, is this part really closed? way/84722067
I can't find any information about it.
Thx.

Hi, thanks. I fixed it now.

Ano je, má to být samozřejmě 634. Prosím o opravu. Díky

Hi,
thanks a lot. I have the Ortophoto already in my JOSM, but as I'm also editing areas outside FGV, I didn't remeber to use this perfect Ortophoto.
I also added Lidar layer to JOSM, so now it will be perfect.
Thanks again.
(I corrected the not aligned tracks).
V

Hi, there is definitely no station. Please stop adding them without verifying it. Thanks.

Navrhovaná komunikace je zde way/453439001
A samozřejmě to je "Ružinovská" (překlep)

Dobrý den,
chvíli jsem to teď nechápal, ale už jsem na to přišel. V OSM je totiž zakreslena i plánovaná komunikace "Ružinovské" a tohle byla její již postavená část. Ale chápu, že správně se tak zatím určitě jmenovat nemá, upravil jsem to changeset/165944634

Není nutné, aby se jednalo o SMV. Jako trunk se značí všechny směrově dělené silnice s mimoúrovňovými křižovatkami dálničního typu. Vracím tedy zpět na trunk.
osm.wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk

I changed it because i thought that highway=ladder is not a valid tag.

Hi,
I see that the previous version were more corect (aluminium ladder). Could you please change it to that?
Thanks

Edit comment of changeset to: "Disused shop #mapycz"

I see you already fixed it (also removed the wd). Thank you a lot.
V

Hi, thanks for explanation. It was caused by the wrong wikidata (Wd of the main peak), which confused me. I will fix it.
Regards

Thanks,
my question is what to do next time (when I find somethink is not correctly marked)? Is there a list of people as you, who can “fix” it? List together with areas of responsibility would be the best.
V

Can you send it to someone to review the situation of marking? If not, just tell me. Thx
V

Hi,
I changed it to highway=path and trail_visibility=no.
Details: User reports that this path (way/1102150845) is not existing, there is also no marking.
If you got someone to forward this issue, please do it. Thanks.
V

Hi,
I know that not all people use Strava. But when looking to those who use, why they don't choose that path?
I also have the report from user, which were on that place and told us, that there is no path.
If you can send it to someone, who will review it and fix it (renew the marking or reroute the marked route) I will be happy when send it to him/her. If not, just tell me, I've got a contact from different part of Italy, but he always helped me (by sending it to someone else, who is reponsible for marking in that area).

I see no reasons for revert, all changes were made according to the evidence (user in terrain and strava).
BR.
V