OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
152654922

Proof at https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=38.366703%7E-90.629484&lvl=22.0&pi=4.8&style=x&dir=60.5

152614326

For High Hill, I made sure Route F connected as specified by the relevant MoDOT travelways because Booneslick Road is not state-maintained. I have seen errors in the travelway defs for interstate interchange connection before, e.g. another Route F over in Wright City where the travelway says it goes to I-70 but the signs clearly state where maintenance ends. MoDOT would generally want a fully state-maintained connection to the interstate, though, unless posted otherwise, so I followed the travelways here in connecting F through.

152566709

This also corrected an instance where Elm Street was called "Elms Street". This was from TIGER originally.

152519926

I left the classification alone at tertiary. Feel free to downgrade if you feel it's needed.

152519926

Looking back at TIGER suggests that maybe development in this area was associated with dropping Route P? I didn't dig too much into the details because I'm completely certain it doesn't exist now.

152472344

This changeset also upgraded way #1286318982 from tertiary_link to tertiary. Yes, it's technically a connector road, but it's functionally an extension of KK in my opinion. There's not even a stop sign for traffic on KK or this connector.

152432774

Imagery is not updated yet. The parking lot is gone. Please don't re-add it.

152395867

Looks like it was set to asphalt without checking the entire stretch for pavement. Part of it is indeed asphalt (part closer to US 183)

152350674

Thanks for catching this even after I closed the note. I only checked the intersection to the east before closing it. Missed the other half of N just to the west

152199354

Even if "registered" didn't mean incorporated, it still doesn't meet verifiability requirements IMO

152182558

There was a gap in 86. Signage is clearly visible on Bing Streetside indicating 86 occupies the same road as do U.S. 60 and MO 59.

152180855

This changeset also added some surface and lanes tags to affected roads which inflated the bounding box

146012998

I kept the part of T to the west of 54 as secondary, as it forms a bypass on Old 54.

145978094

For some reason, the northern terminus of Z was part of the Z relation but had no tag.

145933764

When making road surface gravel, or when adding bridges to gravel roads, make sure to verify the surfaces of bridges

145931249

Huh, I don't know why JOSM didn't autocomplete the source field. I used Bing Aerial Imagery and MoDOT's public domain travelway data from MSDIS.

145905077

I also moved it north of Chestnut Street because the GNIS import 15yrs ago had it wrongly placed.

145904567

I also bumped Route NN to tertiary since it connects to a 2-digit numbered state route and serves as a main street of Parnell.

145862254

This is motivated by the idea that you don't need to enter the asphalt road (which Route C follows) in order to, say, make a right turn from Throop Street onto Vanson Street.

145861788

I bumped the state route to tertiary out of habit, really, but I don't feel like unclassified is a good fit anyway. If it shouldn't be tertiary, just let me know