OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
129569701

Hi
The website link doesn't work, are you sure it exists as all I can find is a facebook page.

Cheers Phil

129324035

Hi Hannah
Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit.

One small problem, in order for a path to be used it needs to be connected to other ways. For some reason you have stopped short of the roads at either end.

If you need any help please feel to ask.

Cheers Phil

129337979

Again there is no legal turn restriction here.

129250678

This junction was correctly mapped before, what are you trying to achieve?

There are no separated ways crossing the junction as you have mapped it.

This edit needs to be reverted.

Cheers Phil

129291675

I have reverted this edit. There is no physical separation so mapping two ways is wrong and your change has broken pedestrian routing.

Cheers Phil

129294134

Again why?

There is no turn restriction here.

Cheers Phil

129292353

Whilst not 'normal', there is no legal restriction on U turns here.

Turn restrictions should reflect only legal restrictions.

Cheers Phil

129338302

Why? It was correct previously.

The physical separation does not cross Glenfield Road and there are not two sets of lights.

This edit should be reverted.

Cheers Phil

121380534

Diolch

121380534

Hi, this edit is a little odd. Wondering why you have changed the Wikipedia language to ab?

Cheers Phil

129249746

Hi
If an object is closed it should not be tagged with the amenity tag as this will lead map users to it despite it being closed. Using tagging such as disused:amenity=toilet is the preferred method. Names should be actual names and should not be used for descriptions or for information such as closed. As this isn't America Restroom is a very unlikely name.
node/304577837

Cheers Phil

125121953

Its not reflected in my memory or mapillary either https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=281711566996173

121828231

Can you cite any in the UK, or mainland Europe? I cannot recall ever seeing such a thing having driven on motorways in many European countries. IMHO it is certainly a quest that should not be enabled in the UK

125948167

If it is marked for cyclists to dismount then it is clearly not fine

127049811

What is the source of this edit. Loose gritty gravel is certainly what I have observed here.

Cheers Phil

124808422

Mapper has not responded so reverting these edits.

127317261

Hi
This edits has gone a bit wrong. Thieves' Lane is not the A5064 or the way to Shrewsbury;Crematorium;London Road Sports Centre;College of Arts and Technology
You have it on the wrong road.

Cheers Phil

126132783

Hi Sam
I tried to contact you over a week ago asking what your motivation is for changing a large number of unclassified roads to tertiary but you have not responded and have continued making these damaging edits. As a mapper I consider this very disrespectful.

This road over the Beacons has been mapped as unclassified for over 10 years, why do you consider that to be wrong? It certainly does not meet my expectations of a tertiary and your edits could result in some very poor routing decisions.

Also please use meaningful changeset comments that inform your fellow mappers of your intentions, line correction is just meaningless gobbledeegook.

Your edits are over a wide area, have you surveyed them? I believe they should be reverted asap.

Cheers Phil

125866612

This seems an odd change, unclassified is probably the correct tag as this road is quite narrow.

Wondering why you changed it as it has been unclassified since it was first mapped 11 years ago.

Cheers Phil

124896240

I have finally got around to updating the operator:type to charitable.

Cheers Phil