Hi
I am a bit confused by this edit. It is normal for roundabouts to be split as part of route relations yet in this edit you have joined the roundabout back into a single way which is no longer correct.
Just wondering what you thought was wrong and needed fixing?

Cheers Phil

Please disregard the above comment, I was looking at a draf policy and made quick assumptions about the URLs.

I was wrong, sorry.

Cheers Phil

Hi
The URL you have previously added seems to contain a lot of random junk, I assume that this is some sort of marketing/tracking activity. If so that is not acceptable use of OSM. For this hotel you only need https://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/bhxsadi-doubletree-stratford-upon-avon/

Also is this account, from the first edit, being used by a single individual. Shared accounts are also not acceptable and all edits in OSM should be attributable to an individual.

Cheers Phil

Sorry, I misread the location on mapillary.

It appears that the vehicle crossing from Highcroft Drive has also gone and has been replaced by a foot/cycle crossing.

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6T7MbkdVlJj21ksONK4oiQ

Sorry about that, do you want me to fix this one?

Cheers Phil

Hi, thank you for your edit however please remember that OSM is not simply a map for drivers.
In deleting this link you have also lost routing for pedestrians and cyclists. Mapillary shows, as would be expected when a road route is cut, a cycleway crossing. Please add this and take care not to break routing in future.

Cheers Phil

I will fix that later.

I am sure you have mapped this from your own

knowledge, but please do bear copyright issues in mind in future.

In osm mapper knowledge is the gold standard, there is no need to provide justification for that.

Cheers Phil

Thank you for the reply.

Is there really a building within a building, or is the outer the garden? In which case it should be landuse=residential.

Cheers Phil

Sorry
Foot=yes/bicycle=yes/horse=yes/motor_vehicle=private.

Hi, welcome to Please do not either refer to, or look at planning applications when mapping. We do not have permission to use them and the maps are based on OS, which are copyright.
The access road was correctly mapped as a track, it is unsurfaced. In the UK an unclassified road will be surfaced, plus this is legally a bridleway therefor motor vehicle access is only for access to properties and should be tagged as private.
Cheers Phil

Should the landuse have changed here, also the road does not connect.

Cheers Phil

Bore da, this is a rather unlikely setting for a neolithic stone circle, maybe tag it as an artwork rather than historic?

Diolch Phil

Hi, thank you for the addition, however I am wondering why have you added the Wash Stones as residential road?

Cheers Phil

Why have you added motor_vehicle=no to a footpath, the highway classification indicates it is not for motor vehicles.

Cheers Phil

Hi, in OSM the name tag should only be used for actual names. It should not be used to make a description render on the map.

Cheers Phil

Hi Tom
You seem to have accidently included residental area way/301340583 in the cycleway 56 relation.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Most of your edits seem to involve copying information from websites. Do you have specific permission to copy from these sites.

The geographical spread of your edits suggest you are not using local knowledge and the address for this one suggests you have placed it in the wrong place.

Please could you confirm your sources and permissions obtained.

Cheers Phil

Hi, how you doing? Are you back in Shrewsbury?

Just wondering why you have removed foot=designated? In GB we use designated on rights of way to indicate that it is a legal right, and not merely allowed.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this appears to be a house rather than a car rental. Is this business verifable, it does not have space to store vehicles.

You have said it is open 24/7, so will you be happy if I knock on your door at 2am?

Cheers Phil

Hi Sam
Not all OS data is license compatible, the name does not appear on opendata.

Do you have a link to where it can be seen?

Cheers Phil

Hi Sam
It is a right of way for foot and bicycles, but you would not want to encourage people to drive up it to park and go for a walk. It is certainly no more than a service road in the OSM sense. Maybe motor vehicle=yes. Also what evidence is there of the name?

Cheers Phil