trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 75875330 | And please add meaningful changeset comments that give other mappers an idea of what you are trying to achieve. Hashtags are meaningless as primary comments. Aviva is an insurance company. |
|
| 75726611 | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. When editing please take care and observe existing features. Here you have crossed an existing right of way withou connecting them. Cheers Phil |
|
| 75516393 | Hi, should these highway=construction have some sort of node connecting them to the existing rights of way network? Cheers Phil |
|
| 75822692 | Hi, what evidence do you have to suggest that this is no longer a track? Cheers Phil |
|
| 75574217 | Thank you |
|
| 75574217 | Hi, welcome to OSM. Has this building been demolished? Cheers Phil |
|
| 75561773 | Hi, welcome to OSM. Just wondering why you have removed this driveway, which is verifiable on the ground and was added to improve deliveries to those premises? Cheers Phil |
|
| 75570080 | Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we add things that exist and are verifiable on the ground. There is certainly not a weird shaped building in the quarry. This is vandalism and certainly should receive no credit as part of a uni project. I am reverting this edit. |
|
| 75422156 | I have restored the splits to the roundabout and kept the circularisation. Cheers Phil |
|
| 75422156 | I can go through and revert the merge if that will help. The other reasons for splitting roundabouts is lane count and destination, and occasionally turn restrictions. Cheers Phil |
|
| 55296972 | Hi
It is likely that the bridleway people will now apply for them to be upgraded as bridleways, so will monitor events. Cheers Phil |
|
| 75422156 | Hi, just wondering why you have been merging roundabouts into single ways? This and others I have looked at had been split to correctly model the paths taken by bus routes. These changes need to be undone to restore the routes correctly. If you need any help doing this then please ask. Cheers Phil |
|
| 74841776 | My observations of amazon edits are leading me to believe that the GPS is not connected to the vehicle, but is contained in the handheld unit on which the driver ask the recipient to sign. When making edits based on gps traces please consider the the driver may have been walking for the last part of the trace. In this case it is highly likely that the trace through the schoolyard was on foot. Cheers Phil |
|
| 73867255 | Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong. There is no residential road here, it is a path. What sources were you using to make this edit? Cheers Phil |
|
| 74381830 | Hi
Cheers Phil |
|
| 70351771 | Hi, this series of edits have gone a little wrong.
way/690693194 creates routeable link through a farmyard which is very obviously not a public right of way and should be tagged as access=private.
|
|
| 74181884 | One of the pitfalls of mass edits is that often objects which are unintendted get changed. Discussion with the community can avoid many such issues. Such as node/6141262678 which is a bus stop, but is now vegan. Is Greggs Bar now vegan?
Is this convienience shop now vegan?
Cheers Phil |
|
| 74181884 | Hi, please could you explain where this, and your other mass edits were discussed? See osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct Also did you seek permission to use your claimed source, which is copyright. It would have been polite to have at least discussed yhis with the UK community on the talk-gb mailing list. I am also not convinced this is permanent in all outlets. On first glance this did seem to be a joke, have you ever been to Greggs? I believe this, and other similar mass edits. Cheers Phil |
|
| 73875674 | Hi Karmsudi
The gps trace is likely to be correct, but the assumption that it is a trace from driving was the mistake. There is a footway here, please use the trace to create a highway=footway here. Thanks Phil |
|
| 74178805 | Hi, just wondering why you have removed the private tags from this service road? In my local knowledge access=private was incorrect, this is a public footpath, however it should be motor_vehicle=private. Cheers Phil |