Is this really a viewpoint?

What are you trying to map here?

Cheers Phil

Thank you for adding this, have seen it when driving passed but have so far not got around to stopping. Will make a point next time.
Cheers Phil

They are not viewponts either, they appear to be just points along a walk which we do not map in OSM.
For example node/6504106785 seems to be just a point where a footpath meets a road. Is there something here that I am missing?
There needs to be a physical feature to be mapped.
Cheers Phil

These are driveways

Thank you for replying, I have reverted all of your additions.
I am told there is a bookmark feature in maps.me which may be a better option.
Cheers Phil

Please do not add misleading data to OSM. This is vandalism and I am reverting this edit

Hi Staggy, ATMs are usually found in built up or areas with a high footfall. This seems a bit unlikely n'est pas?
Cheers Phil

Hi Tiernan
Thank you for your reply, keep on editing. The pupose of the name tag is a very common misundertanding with new mappers.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your edit however the name tag is only used for actual names. It is not a place to add random comments, the incline tag you have added is good enough.
If you have any questions please ask.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
A bit confused but it always concerns me when a first edit is to delete another mappers work. Why have you deleted this residential area, it certainly looks correct to me.
Also please make your changeset comments meaningful and describe what you are trying to achieve, lk says absolutely nothing helpful.
Cheers Phil

Maybe do more than the absolute minimum and extend the residential area?

Cheers Phil

Again this is a bridleway, it does not have public motor vehicle access. Setting to private.

Hi, please look at the existing data and respect it. If you don't understand the terms then look them up, either on the OSM wiki or using your favourite search engine. Take some time to understand the laws and customs of where you are mapping.
Both of these ways are tagged as Restricted Byways, which means there is no public vehicle access. Tagging these as motor_vehicle=yes is therefore very wrong.

I am reverting this edit.

Cheers Phil

Can you really see bollards from aerial imagery here?

Only part of this is paved, I have set the remaining unsurfaced section to track

Reverted

Set to private

Mae Cegidfa yn Lloegr?

However the issue here is that the map was correct before you armchaired it.
Using available sources, such as OS Opendata Streetview the public highway ends where it was previously mapped.
Aerial imagery suggests that there is a private way there, but there is certainly not a public highway. Missing public links such as this would have been mapped years ago if they existed by an on the ground mapper.
Cheers Phil

If there are black lines it is likely to be a public highway.
The big thing to remember is that these area were not mapped exclusively using imagery, they were largely mapped by local mappers who know the area. Look at the history of the surrounding ways when mapping and trust the judgement of the locals.
It is highly unlikely in an area that is not new-build that residential roads are un-mapped.
In the case of this way, I have passed it many times. If I had seen a missing residential road I would have mapped it. What I saw is a driveway which we tend not to map.
Cheers Phil

Hi, please slow down and think beyond your own usecase.
You have drawn a service road through the middle of an existing building. I am aware the building does not exist, but if the existing data is wrong then take some time and care to correct it. Please take some pride in your mapping.
Cheers Phil