The joining PROW would prevent the last stretch being under motorway regulations which suggests the original mapping was correct.
Cheers Phil

Are you not forgetting the there are rights of way crossing that section that someone may want to walk between?

Hi, just wondering why you have added foot and bicycle resrictions to the A14.
I travelled along this section recently and there are no signs to indicate that such a legal restriction exists.
Cheers Phil

Adding some local knowledge here, this is not signed as A46(M), mpaaing it as such is misleading and this change should be reverted as soon as possible.
Phil

HI, this seems a very odd edit. In OSM the name should be what appears on the sign, last time I was at Minffordd the signs said Minffordd, Minfford (FR). Again the sign on Hope Station is unlikely to have Derbyshire in brackets.
These changes appear to be tagging for the renderer and should be reverted.

No response so correcting from local knowledge.

Hi, since when to the Co-op have pound shops? Also is that its correct name? and please capitalise names properly.

Hi, Hopleys campsite is already mapped as an area, creating a node is a duplication.

I am reverting this change.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to osm. Thank you for your edit however the park is already mapped you have therefore created a duplicate object which should be removed. However park does seem to be pushing things here as from memory this area is just a bit of grass with a playground and the name seems unlikely.

Cheers Phil

No response as to the reason so have reverted based on my local knowledge

Why wouldn't it be. Cycling is allowed by default on trunk roads, there is no need for special tags

If these ways are private, how do customers access the campsite?

Vandalism reverted

Please could you explain why you have removed the Spanish name from these objects.

Given the subject that is extremely disrespectful and I would consider it vandalism.

Is way/138945314 really 2 lanes, have you been there to check? It certainly doesn't look like 2 lanes on imagery and based on the location I would not expect it to be. Please remember that we map what exists on the ground as incorrect information can lead to incorrect routing decisions. If we don't know we leave it blank, we don't guess or make things up.
What sources are you using, for example how do you know these roads are surfaced with asphalt?
Cheers Phil

Hi, please remember that OSM is a live database used by people for real journeys. When we tag roads we make sure that the tags we add are necessary and accurate,
There is no point in adding default tags, these just add nothing and clutter the object making it harder for other mappers to spot the real tags.
For example you have added lanes=2 to many roads, have you actually been there and looked. You made many of these damaging edits in the past and you seem to be doing it again. For example way/23031728 looks to me like a single track road so I am unsure why you added the lanes tag as this could lead to incorrect routing decisions.
Cheers Phil

Hi, please could you make changeset comments more meaningful and describe what you are trying to achieve so that other mappers can understand your reasoning.
This one is quite big too.
From what I can work out you seem to have added placenames to landuse areas. The correct way to do that is using place nodes, which already exist. Please do not duplicate that information.
You also seem to have added a lot of junk tags that simply state defaults, there is no need to add foot=yes, bicycle=yes, oneway=no as these are defaults and edits such as these create clutter and make it harder to spot the important tags.

Cheers Phil

Hi, the tracing of the Maize Maze is all very intricate, but we map what actually exists now, not temporary features from about 4 years ago. This existed for a short while around harvest time and autumn half term some years back. Bing imagery is old, mapbox for example is newer. The field is obviously arable farmland and not a meadow.

Hi, thank you for adding these, however when adding height restrictions you should split the road so the restriction only applies to the actual restricted section rather than add the restriction to the entire road.
Cheers Phil

I have changed this to hiking, which still seems a bit extreme.

Cheers Phil