Bore da
This edit has gone very wrong.

It was correct before you changed it, now it points to the wrong page

Diolch Phil

Hi, this edit does not make a lot of sense.

It now says name=Asda brand=Spar, which is it?

Cheers Phil

Thank you.
My suspicion is that this never was a bridge. Carreghofa Lane originally crossed bridge 93, which now carries the cycleway slightly to the west.

This needs a survey, which I will do if it stops raining for long enough, but my suspicion is that the bridge and note tags should be removed.

Dropped bridge is a copy of an error in wikipedia. It is not a bridge but filled in with a culvert running through it.

I have removed the bridge tags.

Cheers Phil

Bore da
This edit has gone a little wrong and has lost important information.

Have you visited and seen something that has recently changed?

In merging 'identical' ways together you have also merged the way that connected them which is not identical, way/925258534/history. This short section is in a culvet so no boats can pass, unless of course its a coracle which you can carry.

This edit needs to be reverted however I am intrigued as to why you made it.

Diolch Phil

Comments directed at Krako73.
The description is very clear and gives accurate information.

Culterted does imply there is no connection, beyond water flow through the culterts.

Unfortunately the reopening of the canal was not taken into account when the A483 was built.

Hi
When you surveyed this pub you missed the most important payment tag which is where it differs from most pubs, payment:cash=no.

Cheers Phil

Ah, hadn't thought of phones. There is no edit on the phone although the details button is there.
Also no obvious way to get control of mapillary. With most images are forward facing so you need to be a few back not right on top of it.

Ok, I see what is going on now.

I had only spotted the edit button, which takes you into the OSM editor and allows you to save each edit.

However there is an I button on the page, which shows the existing tags, some of which may be outdated. For example the name, as in this case.

Brand is a relatively recent tag to be used, traditionally the brand has been in the name tag. This really should be reviewed for each edit. Chances are there is an a name visible which can be updated.

Simply looking at brand is not the best thought out task.

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Phil

Hi, please keep your changes to smaller areas. This one covers much of the UK and Ireland and makes it difficult for local mappers to track changes in their area.

Also please sanity check your changes, for example name=Texaco brand=Gulf doesn't make a lot of sense. node/759749042

Cheers Phil

Hi
As the mapper who originally mapped Markfield I am baffled where you dug up way/1186871119 from as it had ceased to exist before I left Markfield in 2011.

It was always a useful cut through to the village and was well used bt George customers.

There was a lift barrier with a sign stating it was not a public right of way (always open) but the path outside pub car park ceased to exist when the bungalows were built. The barrier remained in from of a fence until The George closed and I assume it went when the building was redeveloped as the co-op.

Cheers Phil

What were you traying to cross the ford with?

The ford certainly looks passable with a horse, tractor or the right Land Rover.

See https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2980140

Why have you removed the town hall and government tags from Edinburgh House. It is the office of the town council.

Thank you for this edit.

Did you happen to spot the orange waymarks for the Shropshire Way?

Thanks Phil

Hi Olivia
Access tags are unnecessary on public roads, they are just stating the default case.

That is why I removed them.

Cheers Phil

No response so have reverted this edit

Hi Paul
This bridge looks a bit long?

Cheers Phil

You have two pubs with the same name at the same location. Why?

Thank you Olivia
Please remember that no means illegal, not discouraged. However this road is part of NCN 82 so even discouraging bikes would be wrong. As for horses it would be very unusual to discourage them on a public road.

Cheers Phil

Bore da
Just wondering why you have tagged way/396445808 as illegal to ride a bike or a horse?
It appears to be just a normal unclassified road.

Diolch Phil