Thank you.

You may want to do the same for any others like this.

Cheers Phil

Hi
This kind of shows the futility of road relations beyond the first 99.

A relation should not be used to link objects with no logical connection beyond a name/ref, what next a relation for all the Railway Inns or Station Roads?

Cheers Phil

Hi Michael
Just curious why you say there is no access for foot or bicycle? Are there signs explicitly restricting bikes or pedestrians?

Cheers Phil

Reverted in changset #155288108

Phil from DWG

Reverted in changset #155288108

Phil from DWG

Hi, a swing gate seems very odd on a footpath. Are you sure it's not a kissing gate?

Crematorioum ?
I would also add Hospital (A&E)

Cheers Phil

Hi
This edit seems to have gone very wrong in a number of ways. What sources are you using as your en-US locale suggests you are not local?

The name tag should only be used for actual names, not as a placeholder for random information. It was this howler I spotted on my OSMand screen.

There is no service road here, there is a track on bing imagery but in no way is this a fire engine road, a most basic survey would show that it is too steep for fire access and it does not exist. However there is signage indicating that the road is a fire route and the yellow box should be kept clear.

Are you in some way employed to make these map edits remotely?

Cheers Phil

Hi
This edit has gone a little wrong. Maxspeed:hgv in Scotland is 40 mph, not 50.

Please ensure you are aware of which country you are editing in.

Cheers Phil

I have corrected the maxspeed tag to 60 mph and changed maxspeed:goods to maxspeed:hgv.

Cheers Phil

Unfortunately that wasn't a typo.

Cheers Phil

Hi, rather than remove the tracktype tag here wouldn't it be better to correct it?

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/941370 suggests tracktype=grade4 would be more informative for routers.

Tracks do however need specific access tagging, this is actually a byway so it is lagal to access on foot/horse/bicycle or in a car. An off-roader would certainly be interested in routing along here. Tagging as a grade4 tracktype provides information to routers not to route a road car here but a Landrover definitely.

Cheers Phil

Hi, what is the source of this edit?

There is no soccer pitch on any available imagery.

Cheers Phil

Hi
What sources have you used for these edits.
I can find no reference to Hells Kitchen in FHRS listings. Also the building=kiosk is certainly wrong here, shop=kiosk may be correct.

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Hi
I am wondering why you have changed a road, that clearly provides access to a house, to a path which will prevent vehicle access?

Rather than private=yes you should use access=private.

Cheers Phil

Hi
Please could you explain the reason for these edits as you seem to have broken routing for HGVs?
By changing way/125103402 to motor_vehicle=yes will break routing by allowing hgvs to use the passenger checkin.

Please discuss these problems with the UK community rather than just changing things to see what happens.

Cheers
Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please can you explain which routers were having problems and what those problems were.
All 3 on OSM are currently working and it is unlikely that they have updated in under 20 minutes.

Cheers Phil

Changed to highway_authority_ref

Changed to highway_authority_ref