trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 144281687 | Precisely what street level imagery are you using? |
|
| 144169053 | Are you sure about this? The original postcode was surveyed using a printed reciept and matches that shown on FHRS and is points right at the garage if you type it into OSM search. NSUL cannot be considered a valid source for armchair edits which break existing survey data. I am reverting this edit. |
|
| 144140550 | Hi
Are you sure you have the change in the right place? |
|
| 114555809 | What evidence do you have that it is illegal to walk on these roads. Pedestrians being prohibited is extremely rare in the UK and in such cases you will find signs such as osm.wiki/File:UK_traffic_sign_625.1.svg. I do not recall such a sign here. Cheers Phil |
|
| 143683033 | Except use of streetview is not allowed for OSM editing, this change needs to be reverted. |
|
| 136175097 | Again what sources are you using for these edits? In this edit you have changed way/117883015 from 30 mph to 40 mph which now contradicts signage visible in open sources. Why have you made this change? Cheers Phil |
|
| 137361731 | What is the source of this edit, it feels very unlikely that the speed limit would be increased here and contradicts available open sources? |
|
| 144085088 | What is the source of this apparently remote edit? Cheers Phil |
|
| 144015479 | In some ways it is tagging for the renderer, but to avoid that you have to make a political decision as to which language should be used. |
|
| 144015479 | As a Welshman I am wondering why you chose Wales over Cymru, after all it was previously first. |
|
| 142593623 | The wiki should be taken with a large pinch of NaCl. It is intended to document how mappers map and not to dictate to mappers. How did you decide that English should be the primary language in these areas? |
|
| 144014981 | How in a bilingual country did you decide that you removed the wrong name. Where did you discuss these edits with the community? |
|
| 143411432 | Hi
The are certainly not a poorly placed rectangle. Why are you making these poor quality inaccurate changes? |
|
| 142446557 | Hi
|
|
| 143835170 | Hi
OSM is a map of the world as it exists, not a place to add fictional data. Cheers Phil |
|
| 143120420 | > There are numerous uncopyrighted sources available all showing the same route.
> "Proposals are un-verifiable and do not belong in OSM." .... In that case, surely the proposed tag as a whole shouldn't be recognised? Lots of other proposed schemes (even ones nowhere near as close to fruition as this) are mapped out in OSM data; eg. Lower Thames Crossing.
> However this is the first I've heard that proposals shouldn't be mapped at all.
> It would've been useful for the NWRR route to be available in OSM data (should it be approved), but I suppose it isn't worth debating given it isn't even viewable on any standard map.
|
|
| 108839766 | Hi
|
|
| 143145145 | Spam reverted |
|
| 143120420 | No response. Proposals are un-verifiable and do not belong in OSM. Reverted. |
|
| 143120420 | Hi, what is the source of this edit? And of course it probably wont happen given very strong local opposition. Cheers Phil |