Bonjour, attention en ajoutant les accès parkings : certains comme ici https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/228749520 doivent être redécoupés sinon vous ajoutez de fausses informations.

way/1124877344
I guess you wanted to add a note or a maxspeed, not a name.

fait !

See https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/quels-tags-pour-les-collectivites-doutre-mer/22756

https://brest.kangouroukids.fr/

Bonjour, Kangourou Kids n'est pas/plus là et ce n'est pas une crêche mais une agence de garde à domicile. office= me semble plus adapté.

Tu as une vision large du Finistère ;-)

Meri i de ne pas confondre numéro de rue et rue. C'est le 13 Bis

sorry for the typos ;-) offset, moved

the intention is good, however ALL buildings in this area are move by a "certain" ofset. If you move a building you should move ALL the buildings in the area - or move the highway to match the land registry

tu pouvais profiter pour virer oneway=no, fait ;-)
changeset/148909097

This modification doesn't seem to be quite right: the building exists on the French Land registry and visible on PCRS raster and Ortho HR IGN, just a few meters North. Nothing again adding the missing building, but please with the right extent and the right definition (wall=no is valid for the moved building, not for the newly created one, mind the color on the Land Registry).

a more accurate orthoimagery, PCRS raster

In this area, you can enjoy

What was written was correct : IT WAS a seamark, it's not a sea ark anymore.

a state agent in the wood, are you kidding?

addr:city
wrong place and useless (the geometry gives the place, As said on the wiki "adding to single elements might depend on local mapping practices"
addr:postcode
same

addr:state
Same + never add an empty attribute

address
also wrong

description, description:fr, opening_hours
never add an empty attribute

latitude, longitude
never add this, it's the geometry.

phone, phone:mobile
also wrong - not international format.

A little bit too munch for a single node, isn't it?

Perdón por el idioma - traducción automática abajo.
Sorry for the language - automatic translation below.
DESIGNADOR is NOT the IATA code, PAR for instance is the IATA code for all airports in Paris (CDG+LBG+ORY), maybe it's a subpart of icao, I don't know.
https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=PAR
DESIGNADOR NO es el código IATA, PAR por ejemplo es el código IATA para todos los aeropuertos de París (CDG+LBG+ORY), tal vez es una subparte de icao, no lo sé.

https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=PAR

Sinon un vrai talus c'est plutôt hedge=hedge_bank

Oui, MS BOT et ThomasDu ont corrigé le problème que vous aviez introduit et semble-t-il pas compris :
relation/5513121/history