tomhukins's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 39012465 | I'm fairly sure you have labelled a car park service road near Wimbledon station as "Alexandra Mews" and the real Alexandra Mews doesn't seem to appear on the map. I might have misremembered though, so this needs checking. |
|
| 38697794 | Hi, thank you for editing the map. It looks like you have tagged several of the ways in this edit as "area=yes" but your changeset description suggests these represent buildings. You might want to replace the "area" tag with a more descriptive "building tag". Again, thank you for helping to improve the map. |
|
| 38503772 | Yes, I reckon the pub is where Kaldi is. Like you, I've lived in Wimbledon almost 2 years. I've mapped the Leopold Road shops and some of the shops in Wimbledon Village, but there's always lots to do.. The only meetings I know of in London are centrally. I agree it would be fun to do something locally and I'd be happy to help out, although I'm also organising other (non-OSM) events at the moment so I don't have lots of time for that. I'm enjoying seeing your edits, watching the map improve in Wimbledon. :) |
|
| 38639020 | Heh, I've just removed it in changeset/38646369 |
|
| 38639020 | Hi, Derick. I remember discussing mapping Wimbledon Park with you on Tuesday. :) The node you've added here node/4127594190 duplicates node/793236444 so now it looks like there are two sets of toilets here. |
|
| 38503772 | Hi, thank you for all your recent edits in and around Wimbledon. It's good to see the map improving here. This edit seems a bit odd though: you've added various amenities but not their names, making it hard to verify. The pub you added next to the station definitely doesn't exist - node/4117016449 - I assume that's a mistake. |
|
| 36492505 | Thank you for the explanation. |
|
| 36492505 | Hi. Thank you for your work improving OpenStreetMap. I keep track of all changes in the Wimbledon area and I'm a bit confused by this one. Your comment says "add district" but as far as I can tell you haven't added anything. I thought I should point this out in case you accidentally missed something. |
|
| 36140632 | This change adds traffic signals at node/3907722168 which look like a mistake to me. As ever, thank you for your work on improving the map. |
|
| 36023800 | Hi, Thank you for editing OpenStreetMap. It's always good to see new people contributing. However, I noticed you added a building that takes up all the space between Hamilton Road and Hardy Road. I assume this is a mistake, as there are many buildings here, so I have removed it. I hope you continue to work on the map. If you have any questions about doing so please ask - I'm happy to try and help. Tom |
|
| 35847977 | No problem. Thanks again for adding useful information to the map. |
|
| 35847977 | I have moved the new information you added on to the existing node in changeset/35881020 |
|
| 35847977 | Thank you for improving OpenStreetMap. I track changes to the map in Wimbledon and noticed a small problem with this edit. This change adds a new node for Bayley & Sage at node/3884841457 but there's already an existing node at node/423749758 so the map now contains duplicate information. |
|
| 35399544 | Hello, thank you for improving OpenStreetMap. You mention that you have copied data from TFL's Web site. However, this is a copyrighted source. Given osm.wiki/Copyright I wonder if you should revert this edit. What do you think? |
|
| 26384576 | Hi, I notice you set the addr:housenumber as "1-5". Given that Two Sisters are at number 3, this seems wrong. Was this a mistake? |
|
| 34087854 | Thank you - that's helpful to know. |
|
| 34087854 | Hi, the zebra crossing footpath you added at way/371235450 looks like a duplicate of one you added 12 months ago at node/3187432450 - it seems odd to map the same feature twice. |
|
| 30459309 | I have deleted the non-existent cafe: changeset/34795649 |
|
| 34259834 | This edit has resulted in misrepresenting the shape of Waterloo Road. I've moved the node to a more sensible place in changeset/34566164 but I'd be grateful if you review my change and improve it if necessary. |
|
| 18188000 | I assume the Cath Kidston shop has "operator=Barclays Bank PLC" accidentally set from its previous use as a bank:
Do you have any objection to removing this tag? |