Thank you for all your helpful work improving the map. I notice you mistakenly tagged this shop as opening at 5pm, presumably 17:00 was a typo for 07:00, so I have fixed this in changeset/179768180

I see you have reverted my changes in changeset/179089114 without discussion. Why?

I notice you are tagging things as "bicycle=no" again.

The discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-a-problem-with-a-user-being-very-rigid-with-legal-interpretation-of-access-rules/139067/36 suggests bicycle=dismount would work better, although conscensus seems to be most pavements are best tagged without any bicycle=*.

What do you plan to do about this disagreement of approaches to mapping?

Thank you for the quick reply. If the footpath no longer physically exists then deleting it was the right thing to do.

Mentioning the physical removal of the footpath and change of ues from pub to house in the original changeset description would have been helpful, but the most helpful thing is that you have mapped what is on the ground.

Again, thank you.

Thank you for helping to improve the map.

Does the footpath you deleted at way/503381755/history physically exist? If so, it belongs on the map with suitable access=* tags specifying how it can be used according to the planning application.

The OpenStreetMap project maps what is on the ground and we do not delete things that exist.

Thank you for your helpful work improving the map. Might opening%20hours=closed?uselang=en-GB make more sense than the "opening_hours=off" here?

I have fixed various mistakes introduced by these changes in changeset/179089114

Although it's not documented on the Wiki, several mappers have used https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=aviary to map small aviaries as opposed to a large zoo=aviary.

There's also man_made=dovecote but I suspect that's not the right choice here.

Thank you for editing the map.

Are you sure there is a zoo at node/12520590340? Aerial photography suggests this is unlikely. Perhaps it is an aviary.

Also, please use the "name" tag correctly: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Thanks again, that's great.

Thank you for your quick reply @OpenCalle. I have updated the car park in changeset/177234642

Thank you for helping to improve the map.

I realise you did not add the name "Customers" to the car park at way/358703641 but you have added helpful information since.

I'm almost certain this name is wrong, and that "access=customers" would make more sense, but I notice you added "access=yes" in changeset/164627916, suggesting any member of the public can use it. Is there any time limit on how long visitors can stay?

Thank you for your helpful contribution to OpenStreetMap.

The opening hours to added to way/1465733332 as "Fri-Sun 7-11" aren't in the correct format described at opening%20hours=*

Is this club only open between 7pm and 11pm between Friday and Sunday or did you mean something else?

If I'm right, the correct format would be "Fr-Su 19:00-23:00".

Please don't take this as criticism: it's great that you have contributed to the map and I would like to help add to your improvements.

Thank you for adding this to the map - I never knew it was here!

Its Wikidata record suggests the bunker_type=pillbox tag might be suitable: does this seem correct to you?

In this change you have helpfully added pavements alongside roads correctly tagged as footway=sidewalk.

However, you have not updated tags on the corresponding roads to sidewalk:*=separate as described on osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way

One example is your addition of way/1230085017 without updating way/168557745

Please revisit the changes you made and improve tagging on the roads for consistency.

Is the whole of this building "Haanbaagasuteki"? I see other restaurants such as node/5215406428 and node/13062175201 mapped as nodes within the building.

Why not do the same for this restaurant?

Thank you for replying.

Can you tell me more about the OSM project you participated in and share the instructions you received?

There are no specific guidelines for Manchester, but there is general advice that these changes do not follow: osm.wiki/Sidewalks

Are you willing to fix the mistakes you made, do you need more information, have any questions, or would you like me to fix things?

Thank you again for mapping this path and the other you added in changeset/175690317.

I don't know this part of Wirksworth well enough to have used these paths, but as mapped these paths are dead ends that don't connect to anything other than Spring Close (in this case) or the cemetery path (in the other case).

If these two paths are disconnected in this way on the ground, what you have mapped makes sense, but if not you might want to consider joining them to other features.

As ever, ask if you have any questions.

I have switched the "name" to "addr:housename" in way/292296184 and fixed a couple of mistakes moving a residential street and a railway line.

Please let me know if you see anything wrong with my change.

Thank you for your insightful reply.

I have contacted the mapper at changeset/131009801 and created a note for others to check.