Thank you for adding things to OpenStreetMap. Your changeset comment suggests this is a pillbox, in which case bunker_type=pillbox might be more suitable than tagging this as a castle fortress. What do you think?

Thank you for all your useful work on OpenStreetMap.

It would be helpful to state whether these toilets are inside Tesco or Marks & Spencer, perhaps using the operator= tag. Currently it's unclear.

Thank you for your quick, helpful reply. I have deleted the name in changeset/148241513.

Also, thank you again for improving the map: it's always good to see mistakes fixed.

Thank you for helping to improve OpenStreetMap. We use "name" for the name of a street, not it's description. I suspect the road at way/281100859 doesn't have the name "Unadopted Road", so it shouldn't have a "name", but I want to check with you as you likely have better local knowledge.

Is it possible for pedestrians or other non-vehicle traffic to reach Roughtown Court along this road?

Thank you for your helpful work mapping the Derwent Aqueduct.

The name "Syphon Outlet" in way/203987332 looks like a description not a name: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Thank you for improving the map. I notice you have added a lot of postcodes in this edit. What are you using as your source for these?

Unfortunately, UK postcodes are not open data, as described at osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom#Other_schemas_and_standards and we need to avoid adding copyrighted information to the map.

Thank you for all your good work on OpenStreetMap.

This change adds a name of "Central Retail Park (demolished)" to way/262183470 but I doubt "demolished" is or was part of its name: it's a description of its status.

The principles of "Name is the name only" described at osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only and the Lifecycle prefix described at osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix describe why "demolished" doesn't belong in the name in more detail.

Thank you for your improvements to OpenStreetMap. This change adds a cape, but another node with the same wikidata tag at node/6572722269 - it seems wrong to have two of them but I'm unsure which is correct.

Thank you for your improvements to OpenStreetMap. This change adds the name "Mull of Kintyre" to node/9798021785 but there's already a "Mull of Kintyre" with the same wikidata tag at node/6572722269 - it seems wrong to have two of them but I'm unsure which is correct.

Thank you for confirming. I've updated its tags in changeset/142966491 and moved it closer to the road outside the boundaries of the heath.

The "highway=rest_area" seems wrong to me. Aerial photography looks like more of an "amenity=parking", "parking=layby" where you wouldn't expect to find toilets. Does this seem reasonable?

I've fixed these and others nearby in changeset/142106296

As ever, thank you for your helpful work to improve the map.

You have tagged these four new buildings with building=terrace, which is the tag for a row of terraced houses, not an individual terraced house: building=terrace

It makes more sense to use building=house and house=terrraced here.

This change adds an embankment at way/1098380785 that goes straight through an existing cycle path at way/669688779 - it seems unlikely that this is correct so I have created a note at note/3865001

Thank you for the helpful explanation. Your change would have been easier for me to follow if you had extended the existing way way/83250677 instead of adding a new way at way/1190965461

Thank you for this. I noticed a typo in the name of Albion Tap which I have fixed in changeset/139960314

Thank you for adding this: I have added more details in changeset/139960125

Hi, I realise these changes are from a long time ago, but you have mapped a castle at node/2947977788 that aerial photography suggests doesn't exist, and probably hasn't existed for a long time.

I've created a note at note/3835208 in the hope that someone with better knowledge than me can fix this.

Easily done: thanks for your quick reply.

Thank you for your work on the map. A previous discussion we had at changeset/116631600 suggests this is incorrect. What do you think?