This change seems odd to me: you claim to have used OS OpenMap Local (October 2022) as your source but I do not see this road named on that map. Did you get the name from somewhere else?

Also, are you sure the road is named "Coblers" with one "b" and not "Cobblers"?

Thank you for improving the map.

This change adds node/8645541477 tagged as amenity=bus_station, but it looks more like a depot=bus.

Also it looks like it's a duplicate of way/41184797 so it might be worth deleting the node, copying relevant tags onto the way and fixing the tags to use landuse=industrial, industrial=depot, and depot=bus.

Does this seem correct to you?

Thank you for improving the map.

I notice you have tagged way/222756984 as amenity=bus_station but its name suggests it's a bus depot: depot=*

Also aerial photography suggests it's part of way/488047087 rather than a separate bus depot.

I think these changes might fix the unresolved note at note/3762012

Well spotted: I hadn't noticed the way is already tagged as stepping stones. I agree it makes sense to remove the tags from the node in this case.

Unfortunately taginfo shows nothing helpful about other tags used for stepping stones: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/ford=stepping_stones#combinations

However comparing https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1xcR and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1xcT suggests that flood_prone=yes has more use on stepping stones than intermittent=yes

Thank you for updating this. The fixme note is particularly useful. I've removed the old "disused:amenity=toilets" tag in changeset/138268136 as the building shows no sign of its previous use.

Thank you for making this useful improvement. ford=stepping_stones seems like a more suitable tag than "ford=yes" so I have made this further improvement in changeset/138267872

I haven't used Street Complete yet but keep meaning to try it some time. Thank you for letting me know.

Thank you for this helpful change. I notice both these nodes still have "naptan:verified=no". If these are nodes are tagged correctly in the right location you might want to removed this tag as described at naptan:verified=*

Thank you for adding details to OpenStreetMap.

This change adds a new node for "Barclays Bank" but it looks like a duplicate of and older node at node/10083334912 which you have edited in the past. You might want to delete this new, duplicate node.

Thank you for all your contributions to OpenStreetMap. The name "Formerly The Bandstand Pub - demolished after fire in 2018" looks more like a historic description than a name as described in osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only so I have removed it in changeset/134827012

Arguably, demolished:=** could apply here depending on the relevance of ideas discussed in osm.wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts but I haven't applied these tags here.

Thank you for helping to improve the map. The name "Old Tollhouse (for hill)" that you added to way/880163577 seems incorrect to me: it looks more like a description than a name as explained in osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hi, thank you for helping to update the map.

As this hotel was known as Alison House for many years, I have added that name as an "old_name" as described in old_name=* in changeset/134084213 to help anyone searching for the previous name.

Thank you for improving OpenStreetMap. Aqueduct Cottage was a ruin when I last visited several years ago but https://www.derbyshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/news/derbyshire-wildlife-trust-invites-public-opening-restored-aqueduct-cottage suggests it isn't any more, so you might have added some of these new tags a little too late.

Hi, I assume way/317749709 is mistakenly tagged as building=yes

Thank you for adding this new drinking water point.

I think I read somewhere that it's only accessible during the ticket office opening hours, which makes since as you've mapped it inside the building. I notice way/949048580 doesn't currently have opening_hours tagged, which would be a useful addition.

Next time I'm at the station I'll try to find out the opening hours and tag them.

As ever, thank you for your excellent work on the map.

It seems a bit strange to tag way/948297086 as building=church though. I wonder if this happened by mistake.

Thank you! I kept meaning to tidy up the map round here whenever I walked past, so I'm glad you got round to it.

Thank you for all your work improving phone boxes on OSM. From the description of this change, it seems like there's no longer a phone at node/9920987811, but it's still tagged as "amenity=telephone". I wonder if this tag needs removing to reflect the booth's current use.

Although there's a K6 phone box here, I believe it's not used for that purpose any more, so I wonder if amenity=telephone still makes sense.