Thank you for all your helpful work improving the map. I notice you mistakenly tagged this shop as opening at 5pm, presumably 17:00 was a typo for 07:00, so I have fixed this in changeset/179768180

I see you have reverted my changes in changeset/179089114 without discussion. Why?

I notice you are tagging things as "bicycle=no" again.

The discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-a-problem-with-a-user-being-very-rigid-with-legal-interpretation-of-access-rules/139067/36 suggests bicycle=dismount would work better, although conscensus seems to be most pavements are best tagged without any bicycle=*.

What do you plan to do about this disagreement of approaches to mapping?

Thank you for the quick reply. If the footpath no longer physically exists then deleting it was the right thing to do.

Mentioning the physical removal of the footpath and change of ues from pub to house in the original changeset description would have been helpful, but the most helpful thing is that you have mapped what is on the ground.

Again, thank you.

Thank you for helping to improve the map.

Does the footpath you deleted at way/503381755/history physically exist? If so, it belongs on the map with suitable access=* tags specifying how it can be used according to the planning application.

The OpenStreetMap project maps what is on the ground and we do not delete things that exist.

Thank you for your helpful work improving the map. Might opening%20hours=closed?uselang=en-GB make more sense than the "opening_hours=off" here?

I have fixed various mistakes introduced by these changes in changeset/179089114

Although it's not documented on the Wiki, several mappers have used https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=aviary to map small aviaries as opposed to a large zoo=aviary.

There's also man_made=dovecote but I suspect that's not the right choice here.

Thank you for editing the map.

Are you sure there is a zoo at node/12520590340? Aerial photography suggests this is unlikely. Perhaps it is an aviary.

Also, please use the "name" tag correctly: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Thanks again, that's great.

Thank you for your quick reply @OpenCalle. I have updated the car park in changeset/177234642

Thank you for helping to improve the map.

I realise you did not add the name "Customers" to the car park at way/358703641 but you have added helpful information since.

I'm almost certain this name is wrong, and that "access=customers" would make more sense, but I notice you added "access=yes" in changeset/164627916, suggesting any member of the public can use it. Is there any time limit on how long visitors can stay?