Hi, thank you for your helpful work improving OpenStreetMap.

I notice you tagged a building as "Gallery Oldham", which makes sense as the gallery exists in this building. However, the building is also used as a library.

Both these facilities exist as node/10022209197 and node/12312824270.

In the spirit of osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I suggest removing the name from way/1094285094 - does this sound like a good idea to you?

I have made this change in changeset/165881684

Thank you for all your good work on OpenStreetMap.

This change names both the farmyard and farmhouse as both "Study Farm" which seems a bit awkward.

I suspect it would be slightly better to use "addr:housename" instead of "name" to tag the farm house. What do you think?

Thank you for all the helpful information and fixing the misshaped buildings.

Your description of the street's addresses suggests osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom#addr:substreet,_addr:street_&_addr:parentstreet might help tag them better.

Thank you for adding details to the map.

What does it mean for node/1246881721 to have both "step_count=1" and "steps=2"?

This changeset adds the "step_count" tag to a stile that already has "steps" specified.

Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.

I notice you have tagged the service road at way/1222211042 as "access=customers" but the car park that it forms part of at way/768586253 has very few tags.

It would be helpful to add more descriptive tags such as "access" to the car park itself.

Again, thank you for your good work.

Thank you for all your good work on OpenStreetMap.

I notice you have mapped a row of houses to the east of Kinder View: way/46773347

These houses all have addr:housename of "Kinder View" where I expect they should have addr:street instead. Is this a mistake?

Also numbers 3 and 4 at way/1310648334 and way/1310648307 are triangular, which also looks like a mistake.

This is not how addresses work in Manchester. Unfortunately Merzof never engages in changeset discussions: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8571542

I see no evidence that you have understood or fixed the problem I described.

I strongly encourage Meta / Facebook to stop clumsily editing the map in parts of the word that you have no knowledge of and do not understand.

I will tidy up the mess you made myself in due course.

It looks like you have since fixed this in changeset/163722125 - thank you :)

Hi, you have tagged the gate in the middle of Long Lane, blocking all traffic passing along the road. Is this correct? I suspect the gate probably belongs on the smaller road to the car park.

Thank you for all your work improving the map.

Are you sure this change makes sense?

You appear to have connected the pedestrian area outside Piccadilly station to the sidewalk that runs alongside Store Street underneath.

There is no way these two routes are connected: making wildly incorrect changes like this is incredibly unhelpful, and it's sad to see Facebook paying people to do this.

Please revert these mistaken changes that will mislead people using the map and avoid editing places you do not understand.

Thank you for helping to improve the map.

Adding the name "Pennine Way" to sections of the route seems unhelpful though.

The relation relation/4082615 already exists, so I suggest duplicating this information on ways, such as way/24779055, adds no value to the map.

Thank you for your continued work on OpenStreetMap.

When you add sidewalks to the map, such as at way/1364211724 please tag the corresponding road such as way/64059761 to note that the sidewalk is mapped separately, as described at osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way

Thank you. I often drive past here, but haven't got round to stopping and surveying the area properly.

This change adds two separate features for Lees Brook Mill so in the spirit of osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I have merged them in changeset/162478933

Thank you for adding the building outline: it looks like this duplicates the Aldi that already exists at node/11351112076

As I mentioned on note/3988550 I was unsure of the building's exact shape when I mapped the supermarket as a node.

It's probably best to delete the older node and move its tags onto the newer way you added rather than duplicating information: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Thank you for your prolific work on OpenStreetMap, but please don't add duplicate information.

This change adds a node node/12303973241 that duplicates node/12303973241

You also added node/12303973299 while removing useful information from way/1112048603

In both cases, Aldi and B&M occupy the whole building, so tagging the way provides a more helpful description than adding a node that covers a small part of the way.

I'm fairly sure there is both a Barnardo's and Matalan here, so I'm unsure your fix describes what's on the ground accurately.

I have noted this at note/4590104

Thank you for fixing this, and similar with Greenfield nearby.