This is a serious project. Please stop adding non-existing "slipway" or aerialway platter in a village.

หมู่ที่ 8 not on village sign. We also tag on place=village and not on landuse

please connect new roads to existing ones and not simply end the road nearby without connection

please make sure new roads are connected to the existing ones

changing a track into a secondary is unjustified here. I assume it was by mistake and fixed it, but please be more cautious when modifying existing streets.

please use English language and not Morse code for your comments.

We are a community and like to know what and why you mapped here. It is not helpful that you "editied many things". Try to give us a hint what was broken and why you modified it. Especially with large changes like these covering many Elements.

You are adding here details down to a very high resolution. Unfortunately the available imagery is not well suitable for this detail. While on Esri the parking lots roughly match what you mapped, they don't on other imagery sources.
Be aware that especially the imagery from satellites often has an offset and other distortions. In other parts of the world exists high resolution ortho-photos with sub-10cm resolution. These might allow such kind of detail. With the the 60+cm resolution available here the mapped data might be discarded once it turns out to be off.

Are you trying to map in a way it "looks nice" on the rendered map? Please try not to do this. There are many different map styles in use. And what you think looks nice on one might look horrible on another.

why have you moved the school? I am quite certain the school is closer to the original coordinates, then where you placed it.

what areas are you adding? What is the source of these polygons?

what kind of area are you trying to add here? How can we, the community verify the edit?

Thank you. Please feel free to improve the map data as needed.

I used http://compare.osm-tools.org/ to find areas with gaps in the data. Then I used aerial imagery to derive roads from these images. It can well be that also the alignment is not perfect. Maxar Premium is usually quite good. If there are GPS traces in your area, try to compare them with the aerials to be sure.

please do not leave private notes. This is a public map database.

are you aware that by using this tagging style you are adding nothing meaningful to the database? Did you try to map buildings?

Where did you get all these road-names from? Especially those on the Thai side do not sound familiar to me.

The others are a bit more borderline, as they could serve the purpose of providing access to the fields, or a service road to reach the farm building. Certainly for roads which could be used as a "via" shortcut by routing software, a bit more caution is needed before even mapping such roads without proper ground truth.

Beddhist, I checked way/52049156. From aerial it is not visible whether this is a track or a residential. Even it could be a service driveway to the building on the east.

Just to be explicit as it sounds a bit like you suggested to automatically convert everything unpaved into an agricultural road: This is not the definition of a track. "roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc". What it clearly misses is the "surface=unpaved" tag. With me having seen similar roads having official Soi x signs, they could well be residentials.

what interconnection is way/604380751 serving to justify unclassified? Besides it ending half-way on a clearly visible road, it looks much like an agricultural road, so highway=track

way/614519089, way/587273653, way/587297594 have no function as interconnecting the grid. From the aerial is seems the only function of these ways is to serve access to the fields. So probably more agricultural, thus highway=track. From aerial it looks a bit like surface=paved.

how do you think วัดไทรงาม is a castle?`
node/4503640890

way/606823695 goes through buildings on some layers. Needs timestamps of layers.
Also: why service and not residential?