spiregrain's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 114067795 | Done - via changeset/114099728. |
|
| 114067795 | For the old pub and old courthouse in this changeset, I'm minded to set them to building=pub, building:use=residential (since it is visibly a pub building); and similar for the old courthouse, now used as a church. Any objection? |
|
| 112777472 | Thanks! |
|
| 112777472 | Thanks for this and your other recent correction. Can I ask - how do you spot them? I use Osmose, but it did not identify either of these (and it has issued me some false positives too). Is there a tool you use? |
|
| 112525704 | Note that Great Eastern Road is signed as being part of C2, toward Bow - sign at Unresolved note #2860161 |
|
| 111324415 | Right, so it's the presence of a postcode on tbe building that drives the exceptions on mathmos. Understood, and I agree with your suggestion. When I'm adding doors-with-addresses, I'll remove postcodes from the building if it's across multiple streets. |
|
| 111324415 | Hi eastender. I just wanted to pick your brain on the allocation of addr:streets to buildings that face onto multiple streets and contain addresses with multiple streets - like way/964080374. You've made it part of Stratford Road in this changeset. But it also has addresses on Maud Road. Do you have a reason to add addr:street to the building, and what's your criteria for choosing which street? (Interested because I've been adding a lot of surveyed address data in this area, and I could try to apply your criteria as I go) - regards, Ken |
|
| 107982035 | Great, thanks. When I last passed it, they didn't seem to be 100% open. But they seemed to be recruiting for a zero-waste type of operation. I'll look out for the yes / only distinction next time I'm there. Probably within the month. |
|
| 110333355 | Thanks! On my way out last night, I noticed that the banners on Great Eastern Road have changed from "coming soon" to "now open", so it's all lined up! |
|
| 110333355 | Is it open then? Brilliant! |
|
| 108278023 | Oh yes - so it is. Thanks for getting back to me, and sorry to hassle you. |
|
| 108278023 | Hi there - are you sure the roundabout at the Richmond Road/ Hampton Road boundary is really gone? I *think* I remember it being there a few weeks ago, and the 'Bing aerial imagery' you've used as a source for this changeset shows it pretty clearly. |
|
| 107436858 | Thanks for all your work with StreetComplete! Nice to see all the improvements coming in. |
|
| 106859967 | It's very easy to forget about one's own notes! |
|
| 104692831 | Thank you for clearing up my typos again! |
|
| 65244559 | Better images now available; a way has been added (way/837353269) to show old road alignment as a warning. |
|
| 81377815 | Just a note to say that everything I've contributed from NLS out-of-copyright maps has been removed from the database, and replaced bit-by-bit with findings from housenumber surveys, tagged with source:addr:housenumber to confirm. |
|
| 101375440 | Having done more desk research, am now happy that this school is no longer there. Visible only on old ESRI Clarity imagery, not on more recent 2017-era Bing imagery - which shows rubble. Planning application refers to site as 'former' school site and advised that a petrol station is being proposed (LA07/2020/1588/F). Dept. of Edu. site refers to the school being amalgamated to form 'Our Lady and St. Patrick PS' on Edward Street. Have left ways present, with prefix razed:. |
|
| 102472457 | Thanks! |
|
| 102472457 | Thanks for adding this service road. Is there a reason it goes through the fence instead of going through the gate? |