Bravo!

Hi there and welcome to OSM. Where does rhe "street membership" make it look like the buildings are part of the street itself? Have you had a look at osm.wiki/Relation:associatedStreet ? In particular the "roles" section? Members of a relation can have a role,. Please have a look at the link.

Done! I also added a note (note/3165005 ) it seems likely the paths connect and the gates are unlocked, but if you have local knowledge, please link 'em up!

I'll add an alternative route to the GC 11 relation (along the east side down to Crescent Wood Road) at some point this week. Thanks for your help!

Section 11, currently shown as relation/13983952#map=18/51.43839/-0.06617

Hiya. In this changeset, you marked the Cox's Walk Footbridge as closed. Do you know if it's reopened, or whether there is a conventional (or signed) alternative route for Green Chain Walk section 11? https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/walking/crystal-palace-to-nunhead-cemetery

Oh dear. That you!

source given as "Ptolemy Elrington" - this is incorrect. Source should have been given as http://www.offbeat.group.shef.ac.uk/statues/STUK_Edwards_Jonathan.htm

"since" should have been "single" in the message above.

Thanks! Your postcode experiences match mine; though I've tended to only add one since object for each Code Point Open centroid. If you've not used them already, you might enjoy - the FHRS JOSM plugin - https://github.com/kmpoppe/fhrsPlugin & https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/ (which can identify 'missing' postcodes.)

Hi Eastender - just a question on this changeset and a few other similar ones you've made lately. What is the source of the postcode data you're adding? Are you extrapolating from the Code Point Open dataset (the one with centroids). Or have you found something better?

Regards Ken

Sure is! I normally use it in residential areas to help with boundaries. But it's also excellent for aligning aerial images. It's the most accurate source of spatial data we have

Hiya -

Just wanted to note that you can use the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" overlay layer in ID to get the boundaries of railway land, and trace them directly. The "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" data is sourced from the land registry, and 'perfectly' aligned, and expressly permitted as a source for OSM.

But that's armchair mapping, so if you know it's actually open from a recent survey, feel free to revert.

Hi there - I think Corpus Christi College is closed permanently. It does not appear on http://apps.education-ni.gov.uk/appinstitutes/showinstitution.aspx unless you use the advanced search to allow 'CLOSED' institutions. I've added the school building, the deniirn reference number (123-0262) and marked the amenity as disused.

Thanks Jakob- that's what I get for copy/pasting an error!

That tagging and taxonomy makes sense to me for 1) and 2). But what's the difference in real-life feature that distinguishes 1) from 3)?

Thanks for your response. I think you're right that my uneasiness stems from the fact that the default osm.org presentation doesn't distinguish cycleways that are unfriendly to pedestrians with those that are perfectly well shared. I always think it's a pity to see nice paths for strolling turning 'blue' for that reason. The 'Map Key' of the right hand side just says BLUE MEANS BIKES, and reasonable people looking at osm.org would assume that these paths are off-limits to walkers as a result. Perhaps I'll get motivated to propose some changes to the renderer for cases like this.

The intent was to have a building and a restaurant, the building contains more than just the restaurant and is (I think?) mostly residential (or maybe it's offices?). So I was aiming to have an area for the restaurant, within the building. The building has all the physical attributes, like the number of levels. But I messed up and left an amenity=restaurant on the "building-only" area. I'll remove it shortly and close your note.

This changeset swaps highway=footway to highway=cycleway for many ways. In some cases with foot access tagging, in others without. Was that the intent? Is there a source for this change - in-person and on the ground these ways feel more like footways open to bikes, than cycleways open to pedestrians.