I edited that way only *this morning* to add foot=yes (my android app of choice has a hard time routing on unusual highway times without explicit foot=yes). I didn't notice access=yes was already set - it's gone now.

Is the substation at way/1055845442 really called "Little Chef"?

I too have recently walked the length on Ray Lane (Golf Club, East Newhall Farm Cottage, East Newhall, and on to Wrabness Road), and didn't see any indication that it was private for pedestrians. From memory, there was an indication at the B1352 end that it's not suitable for HGVs or something like that. So I'd be inclined to put foot=yes on it.

Thanks for tidying this up!

Bring boots when you get to way/623666728, which has the muddiest section of the whole ring (near Seven Sisters Road). Or detour via Eade Road. The the maze of fields round way/26555603 (Gotford's Hill) are also difficult with shoetype footwear at the moment.

Hah! Reader, I took that detour (from the north). The bit round the Beckton Radar Mast is closed off. But the bit over the lock-gate at Lockside Way has a fence that's easy to squeeze past - then you can get all the way round "Albert Island" to find that King George V lock is lying on the bank in bits. We had to trek all the way back to Upper Dock Walk. But we did the whole Capital Ring in 4 days, and that was the only significant problem.

Thanks for looking at it. I've amended it on changeset/134176094.

I like to use the school tracker here: https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/BT/ to keep on top of changes to UK schools as they open / close / get mapped. So it's easy to spot amenity=school objects that likely aren't actually schools.

is "Derryview Family and Children's Centre" a school, or is it an amenity=kindergarten or something else?

Is *this* in current use as a school?

Is this school in use as a school?

Thanks Mate! I just couldn't figure it out. I couple of years ago I uploaded a set where many houses where tagged tainted=yes, which might have surprised the residents. Like your relation, it was intended to be for my own use only! (Tainted by association with inadmissible address data sources in case you were wondering)

What's this all about? There seem to be a lot more objects in relation/15601608 than might be expected? And that relation has no tags. Noticed it while looking at relation/15601608.

Thank-you! These were all my mistakes, I think.

Can this relation be deleted? This route seems to no-longer be publicised on the TfL website alongside the other Qxx and Cxx routes - neither as a current route nor a proposed route.

Hi there. Have you visited Wanstead Flats or looked at the satellite images or GPS traces? I do not beleive this path exists on the ground, and I'm sure the bridge you added does not. What is your source?

Thank you!

Oops! Thanks you. I don't think I made a habit of it!

Hi there.

In this changeset, you added a fixme to relation/138744: "needs working". I'm looking at the fixmes in my area - can you remember what you meant by this one, and how can it be resolved?

Regards,
Ken

Like this node - way/168227082/history

Hiya - for the quarterly project, I've looked at fixmes in this neighbourhood. What did you mean by "KR" in these fixme notes - as in "KR: access to here?" ?