Another one for luxiaghd, again pointing to problems in the automated processing - see node/10282554742. While it's possible to fix these by hand (seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130938743 ), it would be better if the #tflcid did not mess them up in the first place.

Looks good!

Do these new area sidewalks ever show up in the default osm.org rendering?

Hello - can you have a look at node/10282554684 , created in this changeset? It's stuck t the edge of a landuse=residential area, and it should be on the road, I assume. Please check your processes to avoid recurrence elsewhere.

Best thing would be to draw an area around the whole site, tagged with landuse=construction. Prefix the building and carpark and service roads with "disused:"

When they are demolished, change the prefix to "razed:". When the new builings appear add then as "building=construction". When they are finished and occupied, change to "building=residential" (or whatever). Finally, when the old buildings are no-longer visible on commonly used aerial images, remove them.

Always good to see reference numbers being added! I'm a fiend for postcodes and FHRS codes myself.

But congrats!

Your 10,000th edit!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129779299

Great, another one crossed-off!

How do you get to #156, then? is it through/under 154?

Thanks for this! And welcome to OSM.

I think this particular building will shortly be demolished to make way for new student flats. You might be able to find the details on pa.newham.gov.uk

I do hate comedy routing like that. This changeset (now I look at it, covering too large a geographic area) was prompted by the osmose QA tool, which reports on ways that are part of hiking or cycling route relations. If a way doesn't have matching foot or bicycle tags; that's reported a an error. way/452474053 is such a way. I'll see what I can see on the aerial images re:verges and walkability, and update later).

Yes, Ive spotted something is up with these tags and have stopped trying to please osmose on these.

I've fixed it for the houses on Francis Road (593207544) and had a quick spot check of a few other locations. Can you review and either close this note, or let me know if there are other problems.

Hi there - would you say the lift gate you added (node/9861114674) is accessible to pedestrians and bikes? (I didn't notice a gate during my visit last week, but it looked like works were still underway).

Ken

Hi there. In this changeset, there seems to be a row of untagged nodes, like node node/8506882133. Was there an intent to link them into a footway/sidewalk?

Thank you!

Is "https://hkrhairbeauty.co.uk/" really the name of that place? (Seems unlikely, but you never know these days!)

Thanks!

Hi VictorIE - in this changeset you added a school site as way/1058744980. I think it's a new site for Gaelscoil na gCrann. Do you know if the site on the other side of the road (same institution) is now decommissioned? (I've added some details to the new site)

Fair enough! @tj42 Thanks for the prompt!