Motoday is already mapped directly nearby.

Instead of deleting the node you could have marked this place as disused. Or change it to shop=vacant. This way it would not show up in the map but the node and history would still be accessible. People would know what was here in the past.

Es šos visus liktu kā retail, jo šeit pārdod preces nevis pakalpojumus.

Atkal šajā relācijā[1] biedru lomas saliktas ačgārni. Šobrīd tās vajag apmainīt vietām, citādi sanāk, ka zāles atrodas iekš celtnes.

Ātri var izveidot multipoligonu, turot Shift, klišķinot uz abiem elementiem un pēc tam spiest c.

[1] relation/18785332

Gandrīz mēnesi vēlāk pēc šīs izmaiņu kopas publicēšanas es, apstaigājot Andrejsalu klātienē, secināju, ka jūsu ieliktie ceļu būvdarbi nemaz vēl vispār nenotiek. Lūdzu nekartējiet būvdarbus, ja neesat klātienē apsekojis būvdarbu vietu!

Ok, paldies par skaidrojumu.

Man nav īsti skaidrs šo izmaiņu iemesls. Vai kaut kāds jauns likums aizliedz, ka ar riteni vairs nedrīkst braukt pa ietvi vispār?

Tad lai saliek pareizas "cycleway" birkas tie, kuriem rūp.

Labi, var noņemt cycleway birkas no ceļiem, kuriem blakus ir uzzīmēta atsevišķa velojosla. Bet tehniski, tā ir tikai un vienīgi Cycle Map renderētāja vaina. Dati kā tādi nav nepareizi.

Vai kaut kas salūzīs, ja veloceļi tiks zīmēti atsevišķi?

"cycleway=lane" ir pareizi, velojoslas joprojām neatdala fiziskas barjeras no ceļa. No dažām līnijām noņēmu, jo domāju, ka nav jēgas atstāt, ja es zīmēju atsevišķu veloceļa līniju, bet vēlāk sapratu, ka varēja atstāt, jo tehniski bija taču pareizi, bet slinkums bija atlikt atpakaļ.

Visparīgi, man nepatīk ņemties ar neskaitāmām birkām pie galvenā ceļa, es labāk visus ceļus zīmēju atsevišķi. Tad ir pārskatāmi, kartē renderējas un nav jāņemas ar birku haosu.

@arcth I really recommend you to check out the group chat @richlv posted. We can continue this discussion there. Another mapper made a really good point (that's as good as reply I would give) about this topic so advise you to read it: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/358602-general/topic/rel.C4.81ciju.20lieto.C5.A1ana/near/500852509

Takas nekur nav pazudušas, ir tikai žogs aplikts apkārt! Pats apstaigāju šo vietu klātienē. Un kad reiz sāksiet izskaidrojošy izmaiņu komentārus rakstīt?

Pārsvarā esat veicis aplamus labojumus. Tramvaja sliedes vēl nav nekur sākts būvēt, joprojām proposed. Būvdarbi nenotiek teritorijās, kur nomainījat uz būvdarbiem. Pats dzīvē apstaigāju šīs vietas.

This edit directly duplicated many buildings and had to reverted to save my and other mappers' time. Please don't duplicate buildings.

All your recent edits had created duplicate features like buildings and lakes directly on top of existing features. I reverted these edits. Please don't create duplicate features.

Atliku atpakaļ "name" vērtību pagaidām. Ja izmaiņas autors vēlēsies turpināt šo diskusiju, tad redzēs vai būs kaut kas jāmaina.

I just want to point out that the provided mapillary footage is outdated. Here's a new one from July 2024: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.6729267&lng=25.2726497&z=19.9&pKey=880819717313713&focus=photo&x=0.08102023366484773&y=0.6206059317455411&zoom=0.8075370121130552

And in this region NŽT ORT10LT is outdated too. Bing here is much higher quality and more up to date. The separation between main street and cycleway is clearly visible in both Bing aerial imagery and mapillary footage.

Instead of "not:brand:wikidata" you should add the "operator:wikidata" tag which is Q132157239 in this case.

"Did you try to find out why was the landuse mapped this way before declaring multipolygons useless and mass-converting them?"

That's one the reason why I started this discussion and my theory that you find it easier to edit with mps was confirmed.

This method might be an easier one for you but don't you understand that other editors find it very hard to edit the section in the map you were editing after you, especially iD users? iD editor is quite restrictive, it will straight up prevent user from doing actions that may or may not cause errors, like disconnecting members of a mp or performing actions on an element if it's not entirely visible. That's annoying, but iD is intuitive and modern, interface is visually appealing. That's why I use iD for mainly simple tasks. But randomly comming across areas mapped like multipolygons which I want to edit always makes me sigh and open JOSM to deal with them and then return to iD to finish what I started.

I don't know if there are but from my own experience I know that area borders divided into countless multipolygons make mapping extremely hard, especially for casual mappers who are not into advanced stuff like multipolygons. Other mappers have expressed frustration with this as well. And this can and will confuse new mappers who don't know anything about multipolygons and will be scared to touch them.

The main problem I have with this edit is that you restored multipolygons in first two locations I mentioned without changing almost anything else. Walls and fences around Ziedoņdārzs and Ivana kapi areas could have been easily added without recreating mps. You changed much more around south of Daugavas stadions so I don't have any particular complaints about those changes.

Again, if using this mp technique makes mapping easier, then keep using it. Just don't convert simple polygons to mps without any reason at all like you did in the first two locations.