OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
143955369

Combination of incorrectly marked signals that are actually stop signs + changing signals to be marked at the center of the intersection as opposed to individually coming from every direction into the intersection. will keep changesets smaller going forward!

116518512

Are you interested in explaining what I am doing incorrectly? let's make this a learning experience rather than an attack

131753811

Thanks for fixing. They probably wouldn't be too happy about that...

131493606

Yes, the parking garage is closed
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131493606

125783858

Imagery from this year

123871619

hey john, feel free to adjust based on your explanation, appreciate you reaching out

125783858

Largely based on signage but the citywide speed limit is 25 mph. feel free to adjust anything that appears to be incorrect though!

127977059

Aren't the helmsley walks connected in that they share a wide cross walk across the street?

124457869

@MxxCon there must be a data error on the vision zero page, as that is inconsistent with signs that are depicted on the road itself.

124457384

@MxxCon that was a typo, thank you for catching! I just corrected it.

124251166

You can't u-turn at either end anyway so I'm not sure the purpose of mapping it that way for such a tiny piece of road

124251166

Why does it have to be dual ways for such a short segment?

124119026

*MxxCon, apologies

124119026

@Mmxcon they were originally not aligned to the roadbed at all

124028948

@MxxCon it seems like we're in the T3 situation described here: osm.wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_tracks

To me, the separate way method is visually more accurate and captures more detail. However, I understand this is is not a "set policy"...

124028948

If physical separation is required to map it separately, then perhaps this wasn't the right move. From a visual perspective, it's a 2-way path protected from a one-way street by a row of parked cars

117653500

fixed! thanks for pointing that out.

112038425

I'm sorry I didn't see your earlier messages until, but I do think calling my contributions "vandalism" is a bit of a stretch. I will certainly keep your feedback in mind when making future edits.

112019533

Hi, thanks for your note. If I had removed the cycleway tag on the main way would it have been acceptable edit? (for the portion of the route that is protected)

112038425

Thanks, I’ll definitely do that going forward!