Yes, the parking garage is closed
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131493606

Imagery from this year

hey john, feel free to adjust based on your explanation, appreciate you reaching out

Largely based on signage but the citywide speed limit is 25 mph. feel free to adjust anything that appears to be incorrect though!

Aren't the helmsley walks connected in that they share a wide cross walk across the street?

@MxxCon there must be a data error on the vision zero page, as that is inconsistent with signs that are depicted on the road itself.

@MxxCon that was a typo, thank you for catching! I just corrected it.

You can't u-turn at either end anyway so I'm not sure the purpose of mapping it that way for such a tiny piece of road

Why does it have to be dual ways for such a short segment?

*MxxCon, apologies

@Mmxcon they were originally not aligned to the roadbed at all

@MxxCon it seems like we're in the T3 situation described here: osm.wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_tracks

To me, the separate way method is visually more accurate and captures more detail. However, I understand this is is not a "set policy"...

If physical separation is required to map it separately, then perhaps this wasn't the right move. From a visual perspective, it's a 2-way path protected from a one-way street by a row of parked cars

fixed! thanks for pointing that out.

I'm sorry I didn't see your earlier messages until, but I do think calling my contributions "vandalism" is a bit of a stretch. I will certainly keep your feedback in mind when making future edits.

Hi, thanks for your note. If I had removed the cycleway tag on the main way would it have been acceptable edit? (for the portion of the route that is protected)

Thanks, I’ll definitely do that going forward!

The campus streets that are pedestrian-only carry the name of the original street that ran through, except with "Walk". Hence Locust Walk, Woodland Walk, Hamilton Walk, etc

I certainly didn't intend to make a subjective edit, though it's hard to remember specific details from four years ago from 4 years ago.

from my understanding, these were not "subjective point of view" edits

It doesn't make sense to have a primary designation end at a lower priority road. I'm just trying to fill in the gaps, if that makes sense. Full disclosure: this is one of my first edits on OSM, and I'm still trying to grasp the standards here. I'm sorry if I did something wrong, but it doesn't make sense to have a road where all but 3 blocks are primary (take Water St/Pearl St/St. James Pl/Bowery, these are all the same "trunk" corridor, as they handle a significant portion of the north-south traffic.