seav's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 70341363 | IIRC, "papercut" refers to "death by a thousand (paper) cuts". Basically, we tag these as minor errors on the map that nobody really bothers to fix. We (OSM PH) have since expanded this concept to flag things that need urgent/systematic fixing. |
|
| 70265885 | I did not refer to any imagery and did not need to. I merely fixed changeset/70236153 to preserve data history. There should not be any (substantial) change in the geometry that was introduced by changeset/70236153. |
|
| 69637964 | This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of doing fantasy edits. |
|
| 69638044 | This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of making fantasy edits. |
|
| 69639332 | This changeset has been reverted. |
|
| 70077909 | This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of doing fantasy edits. |
|
| 70111121 | This changeset has been reverted. This user has a habit of doing fantasy edits. |
|
| 70111316 | This change has been reverted. This user has a habit of doing fantasy edits. |
|
| 70111422 | I reverted this changeset via changeset #71395444. It makes no sense for Meralco to "expand" Lopez Building. |
|
| 70942002 | (Note: When the multipolygon relation was created, the cemetery-related tags remained on one of the outer ways. I've fixed this.) |
|
| 66056026 | Minor correction: To square areas/buildings, the new iD keyboard shortcut is 'Q' instead of 'S'. |
|
| 69272705 | Reverting this changeset. The parking lot that this changeset deleted is still operating (I'm parked there right now). |
|
| 69834056 | We really should not be using "construction" keys or values for things that are not *actually* being constructed. If the bridge will be recreated in the future, then it is a simple matter to just draw a new bridge or undelete the old bridge and then re-tag it as needed. |
|
| 69417734 | If this will indeed be implemented, you can use conditional restrictions: osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions Something like:
|
|
| 69214644 | It is OSM practice to only split roads if there is a physical barrier, not a legal barrier. |
|
| 68968622 | If there is no `aeroway=aerodrome` tag near there, then why should they be confused by a name such as "Paliparan"? |
|
| 68968622 | Seconding TagaSanPedroAko here. Use the most recognizable "official-sounding" name (no abbreviations like "Rd.") for the name=* tag. For the official name, use nat_name=* or official_name=*. This is the reason why EDSA is currently tagged name=EDSA (and EDSA Extension), not name=Epifanio de los Santos Avenue. |
|
| 68820151 | I repaired the boundary relation here: changeset/68848604 |
|
| 67812772 | If you visit the site and what is actually being constructed, it is currently just a flyover (and not a viaduct) over SLEX connecting C-5 and C-5 extension. Since both C-5 and C-5 Extension are currently not motorways, tagging this short flyover as a potential motorway is inaccurate. |
|
| 67812837 | See my reply to the other changeset. |