OpenStreetMap
rskedgell's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 74238336 | Left turn from Bucknall Street into Shaftesbury Avenue prohibited from 2020-06-08 by THE CAMDEN (PRESCRIBED ROUTES) (NO. 5) TRAFFIC ORDER 2020
|
|
| 47909592 | In that case, I shall update the park with one changeset per excluded area and leave the LLDC boundary unchanged. |
|
| 85848395 | That statement could perhaps be considered a little controversial. Which guidelines are you referring to? osm.wiki/Cycling_in_the_United_Kingdom does not appear to state that either style is preferred, let alone that highway=cycleway is deprecated for shared use with pedestrians. That said, changing one style to the other against established local mapping convention is unhelpful, but perhaps this is one of the iD editor's suggested "improvements"? AIUI, cycleways and other highways in the UK do not require explicit permission for pedestrian use, but rather require explicit prohibition where pedestrians are not alloweed e.g. with the traffic sign in TSGRD diagram 625.1. Also, foot=permissive means that the way is open to [pedestrians] until such time as the owner revokes the permission which they are legally allowed to do at any time in the future. That may be the case on private property, but then bicycle=permissive would probably also apply. |
|
| 47909592 | I've asked another active local mapper his opinion, but will go ahead and change it unless he can think of any potential problems with it. |
|
| 47909592 | I wonder if it would also be worth altering the outer boundary to remove the aggregates site (Bow East?) where the 2012 warm-up facilities were, as this was never really part of QEOP. Also sites like UCL East, East Bank, Sweetwater and Bobby Moore Academy might perhaps be excluded from the leisure=park multipolygon as inner relations. |
|
| 85739263 | Thanks, I haven't had a chance to check/add these and resolve my notes. The experimental traffic order is here
|
|
| 84937432 | Missing source URL
|
|
| 84892792 | It's only as the surface dressing has worn down that it's become obvious that it's asphalt, rather than a well-maintained compacted surface. The term pea grit/pea shingle was something which caught out a friend and I at Peacehaven parkrun last summer. That term in the course description led us to wear trail running shoes, which are less than comfortable on asphalt or concrete. |
|
| 84874568 | A phone number of "8 800 775-52-93" seems highly improbable for central London. |
|
| 84848132 | I was there around 1400, so I missed you by a few hours. I'm afraid I left a couple of buildings in Hatfield Road slightly askew, but have fixed this in changeset/84883553 Incidentally, I'm using the NLS OS 1:1250/1:2500 1944-1967 as the most reliable alignment, on the assumption that NLS's conversion of OSGB references to lat/long should be more accurate and free of parallax errors. |
|
| 84739824 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing to the map. Where you have mapped the buildings on Beauchamp Place, building=yes is fine, although building=terrace might be better (see building=terrace ), Tagging the buildings as shop=yes is less useful, as this implies that the two terraces are single shops, which is not the case. The few shops which have been mapped so far have been mapped as POIs/nodes. If Beauchamp Place is mostly shops, restaurants, etc. it could be worth adding a landuse=retail polygon around the buildings (see landuse=retail ). |
|
| 83838343 | I think some of that FHRS and address data from Signorelli and Tonkotsu may have been inadvertently copied over to Itsu and Heavenly Desserts. I've updated them in changeset/83948236 |
|
| 55975228 | Are the "Private Field" and "Private Land" really the names of these, or just redundant descriptions of information already conveyed by access=no? If these are private fields within the Syon Park estate, is leisure=park the most appropriate tag for them. They are already within the leisure=park polygon for Syon Park as a whole ( way/506179582 ). Perhaps access=private + natural=* or landuse=* instead? |
|
| 83193664 | Reverted in changeset/83396612 |
|
| 83192090 | Reverted in changeset/83396612 |
|
| 83191158 | Reverted in changeset/83396612 |
|
| 82522582 | Reverted in changeset/83188043 The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits and presumably used as the data source for other tags make it clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
See also:
|
|
| 82523309 | Reverted in changeset/83188043 The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits and presumably used as the data source for other tags make it clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
See also:
|
|
| 82570772 | Reverted in changeset/83188043 The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits and presumably used as the data source for other tags make it clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
See also:
|
|
| 82571484 | Reverted in changeset/83188043 The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits and presumably used as the data source for other tags make it clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
See also:
|