Reverted in changeset/83188043

Reverted in changeset/83188043

The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits and presumably used as the data source for other tags make it clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions

See also:
osm.org/user_blocks/3451
changeset/80903630

Reverted in changeset/83188043

The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits and presumably used as the data source for other tags make it clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions

See also:
osm.org/user_blocks/3451
changeset/80903630

Reverted in changeset/83188043

Verdo deleted in changeset/83187174

There's nothing very unusual about the house numbering, but the imaginary park is now gone, see changeset/83071631

Please also read osm.wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

Hello again, Maddison Young/Maddison Savage.

The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits seem pretty clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions

See also:
osm.org/user_blocks/3451
changeset/80903630

Hello again, Maddison Young/Maddison Savage.

The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits seem pretty clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions

See also:
osm.org/user_blocks/3451
changeset/80903630

The Verdo development may exist, or at least be under construction, but not within your exaggerated and crudely drawn boundary, nor will it be large enough to describe as a suburb. Please map it accurately and tag it appropriately.

Details of the development are in LB Houndslow's planning application 00703/A/P11, which is not an OSM-compatible source.

I'm rather more concerned about the creation of the imaginary River Midway (now deleted).

In that case, please accept my apologies.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, etc.

Another mapper has taken the time to map these individual trees. Whether you think they are unnecessary or not is immaterial. Please revert your changeset.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for adding Margaux.

If I could make one minor comment, the phone number should be in international format, so "+44 20 73735753" rather than national format. Full details on the phone=* tag are on the wiki at phone=*

That looks fine, it's just added the new tag and hasn't deleted any other tags.

Please read the wiki before you change the value of ref=* for an object. For aeroway=runway, this should be:

'the runway designator (for example "02/20" or "09L/27R"). List the smallest designator first (i.e. "04/22", not "22/04"). The two designators of a runway will always differ by 18 (180 degrees) and can have one letter appended (L, C or R). Only use other values in special cases.'

Prefixing the ref with "Runway " appears to be an ill-advised attempt to tag for the renderer.

aeroway=runway

Your changeset description does not adequately justify vandalising the map by removing the name:cy tag.

After doing a test edit on another object with Healthsites.io, it appears that it simply deletes any tags which the application is not aware of, so this is not the mapper's fault.

Repaired in changeset/82317212

Test edit with healthsites.io, which:
- used an address supplied via the website to add addr:full=*, but also deleted all other addr:*=* tags without warning
- added undocumented operational_status=* tag
- deleted building:part=* tag
- deleted contact:website=* tag
- deleted level=*
- deleted start_date=*
I suspect that it may delete any tag which the healthsites.io developers are not interested in, which is unacceptable.

Repaired in changeset/82316909

Similarly, the polygon from which you removed the building tag appears to correspond to the main hospital building in aerial imagery, so I do not believe this should have been removed.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap,

Why do you believe that the branch of M&S has suddenly become a place of worship, oddly one without any specific religion or denomination?

What are your sources for this edit?