Please don'r remove the tiger:reviewed tags from ways that haven't actually been checked. The whole neighborhood on Bald Mtn has poor geometry, and a bunch of roads like way/16414861 are missing connections to other roads or are misclassified.

What made you retag relation/13612073 and relation/13612078 as landfills? They both look like MTR quarries on all the imagery I have.

If you're going to update old TIGER roads, please remove the TIGER reviewed tags; their purpose is to indicate which roads have not been updated (re way/18901119). And please don't create *new* roads with tiger:reviewed=no ... that kind of defeats the purpose of the tag (re way/1366655128).

I would 100% call what is here a tunnel but ok. I have merged the extra ways created.

Can I ask what you are sourcing these maxweight changes from? You don't list any source. I'm particularly curious about this bridge since it's part of active construction.

What imagery did you use to determine bridge was the 'correct' tagging?

What are the numbers in the trail names from? I've seen them on other sites but I can't figure out the source; are they a USFS designation?

I have reverted the NC edits in changeset #161756696 after finding no basis for them on the ground.

Well the point of the note was to *move* the tower, not *remove* it...

What is your source for these changes? I can't speak to the TN changes but all of the NC edits are incorrect.

Be careful when clicking around in RapiD. You somehow added a node to way/1300758334 which caused it to cross itself, breaking the Lake Hartwell relation (142716). You can see it visualized here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1300758334

I have fixed it in changeset #161077773

Interesting, it looks like they applied to move in 2022. I had researched the location a year ago (changeset/146578130) to resolve a longstanding osm note on the location, and found the location to still be on campus.

Are able to add the station info back to the tower, or do we not know which tower it is?

Why did you delete node/357805725? As far as I am aware that's the correct location of the broadcast.

Can you check that way/1318475842 is mapped correctly? I'm not sure what highway=stairway means, and why it's on level -2

IUCN class 6 is just my best estimate for how the land is protected. If Hoosier NF has an officially listed classification I couldn't find it when this change was made.

bump

Those bridges were tagged destroyed in changeset/157376316, I only updated them to match other damage tagging.

**Globe landcover

Do you have a dataset of the cemetery names you are using? Just curious where they're coming from

Hi jbl0, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for helping to update the area post-Helene; certainly a lot has changed.

A few notes for these changes:
- the 'name' tag is used for waterways that have actual names, not just descriptive data. Thus the East Fork New River has a name, but tributaries (there are many) of it are not named 'Tributary of ...'
- The 'tunnel=flooded' tag is used for actual tunnels which carry water. For mapping flood damage from events, we can use the 'damage' or 'hazard' tags.
- The boundary you adjusted is not an actual property boundary, but just an approximation of the woods behind the houses. OSM does not map legal property boundaries or parcels; locally that data are managed by the Watauga County GIS office. So unless the property owner has felled numerous trees to make room for the well house, this data should stay.

I've updated the data to be in line with correct tagging, but thank you for fixing the stream! A lot of waterways have shifted course since the flooding. You can see my changes at changeset/157984492