Well if all public streets are residential roads, then I suppose Linney St can be a residential road.

I was parked on Linney St yesterday. The only thing accessible from it is the PO. I'm not sure what the rest of that means; highway=service does not require private access.

Why did you change way/18905145 to residential? It is actually literally a service road, providing one lane of traffic solely for the post office.

Why did you delete the construction area, or is it opened? It was still an active construction site when I drove past a couple days ago.

Beat me to it!

This change seems to be entirely in contradiction to the goal of that MR challenge. These roads are exclusively for golf carts.

Hi,
Please use more descriptive changesets besides "Tracing" for everything. It's not possible to determine what you're actually editing without digging into every single changeset.

Thanks.

Can you please respond to any these comments? This still appears to be a large undiscussed import, and I'm seeing an increase in edits from your app using the newly-invented tag.

Also please respond to the concerns about your app I mentioned on changeset/149276901

Surely we have something newer than 2012? Over a decade old?

Oh wait a lil web search has revealed https://data-brunsco.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/cf2511356239494eb64f89d9aadc8ddc_0/about

This import also does not seem to follow any of the requires import guidelines osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi awohl, can you please respond to the concerns outlined at osm.wiki/Talk:Key:foot_traffic ? Your tag does not seem to be verifiable or quantifiable for mappers, and did not follow the tagging proposal process or receive any input from the community.

Can you elaborate what you mean by "2 track added"? No features were added here, and no tracks were touched at all.

Where did way/1265676282 come from? It looks like a classic ancient TIGER powerline except it is entirely new from this changeset. It doesn't exist on any imagery I have.

Most of these crossing were incorrectly edited, specifically the ones that are actual crossings on roads and not just parking lot entrances....

The Hellbender Bar node looks fine but the New Public House node (this changeset) doesn't have any descriptive tags, but has a wheelchair tag.

I haven't been there in a while so your survey is authoritative, but from their website it appears to still be operating.

If it's no longer a hotel, what is it? Appears to still serve food according to the website.

Hi BarnesMe, are you editing on behalf of the NC DOT? If so, please make sure to follow the guidelines for organized editing https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Hi __zach__, are you editing on behalf of the NC DOT? If so, please make sure to follow the guidelines for organized editing https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

What is the actual source for these changes? I don't think you surveyed 30k points.

I'm also curious why the waterways that define many of these administrative boundaries aren't being used as the boundaries.

Are you able to provide sources for this or any of your other changes?

This one in particular appears to be copied from Google Maps. Aside from the coordinates the name, address, phone, and website values all follow GMaps formatting and not the formatting used on the company website.