Sveiki, te Siguldas Jaunās pils parkā pievienoti vairāki akmeņi. Dabā tādus neredzu, un ortofoto vispār pavecs (mainījušies celiņi utt). No kādiem datiem šie akmeņi zīmēti?

Hi, thank you so much for the map improvements.
The road added in this changeset, way/1196532494 , is not connected to other roads. This causes problems for routing applications.
Do you happen to know how this road connects to other roads and would have a chance to update that?

Looks like you moved the node already - node/2370468014 .
Perfect, thank you so much :)
If you feel like further improving the map, please consider joining the Latvian OSM community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .

Hi, way/1193998524 currently has width=0.
Should it perhaps be changed to highway=path instead?

This change will be automatically reverted, as the addresses are updated from the official sources.
Should this node perhaps be moved to "Ulmaņa parks 2" instead?

Checking further, 11A is another building - way/123080910 . Should the address change be reverted?

Thank you for the map updates.
Address information is automatically synced from the official data sources, and would be overwritten in near future.
Where does the information about "11A" come from?

Also, the ATM node is currently outside the building - would you happen to know where exactly it is located?

Rūpīgāk paskatoties, laikam bija domāts Ozolu ielas posms (mazliet vairāk uz DR). Palaboju saskaņā ar dažādiem datu avotiem - vai šādi izskatās pareizi?

Sveiki, paldies papildinājumiem.
Spriežot pēc ortofoto un reljefa modeļa, šo ceļu būtu labāk apzīmēt ar highway=track.
Aicinām ceļu klasifikāciju un citas tēmas apspriest arī kopienas čatā: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .

Yeah, sorry about the confusion :)

I had messed up the extent of the boardwalk (failed split?).
Fixed now - the boardwalk is actually very short.

Thank you for spotting, fixed now.

O, paldies. Agrāk bija liels uzraksts "Veikals".
Vai veikals tur tiešām bija, vai tikai uzraksti palikuši? :)

Oo, bet ir veiksmīga Mapillary bilde - izskatās, ka tas otrs veikals ir zudis:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1621493214985317

Liels paldies par atbildi, tad tiešām jāpārbauda. Nesen tur biju, bet nepamanīju šo punktu tajā brīdī :)

Sveiki, te pievienots veikala punkts: node/8496527560/history .
Vai varētu būt, ka tas duplicē šajā ēkā esošo LaTS veikalu?

Hi Aleksandar, thank you for your reply.
It seems to be rather generic, though. As this same problem has happened multiple times, could you please detail the exact steps taken to fix this - especially regarding the manual aspect (as per the changeset message, "Manually checked")?

Such repeated problems show Microsoft and Bing in a less positive light, and create unnecessary tensions with local communities, which eventually can lead to arbitration by DWG, account blocks etc. That's something we all would like to avoid.

Latvian OSM community is the most active in this Zulip chat currently: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
It would be greatly appreciated if you had a chance to join and discuss this topic with the community - we have representatives from other companies doing that with great success.

Additionally, in June 8-9 the State of the Map Baltics conference takes place in Riga - we'd be happy to welcome you to Latvia and work together in person for a better map in the future :)
https://2023.sotm-baltics.org/

Hi Aleksandar1994, as this problem does not seem to be an exception, please pause any additions in Latvia for now.
Before resuming, please discuss with the local community (preferably at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com) how to best fix these recurring issues.

Oh, I see - thank you for checking it, that makes sense.

Thanks, looking at these images, construction seems to be ongoing to the left pretty much up to the roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1277585273166386 , https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=952713332430452 .

Also, along Lubānas iela, it's ongoing right up to the edge of the street - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=126500963740001 .

Perhaps construction transcends the boundaries of that one parcel?