rayleigh1's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 131777054 | 👍 |
|
| 122426844 | 👍 |
|
| 134260674 | 👍 |
|
| 164110787 | Rzeczywiście, literówka z mojej strony. Dzięki, poprawione. |
|
| 155652946 | Dzięki za czujność, poprawione, aczkolwiek widzę że to nie ja tylko edytor wcześniej tak ustawił, ja tylko zesplitowałem drogę w aplikacji. |
|
| 155652946 | Musiało mi się źle w guzik kliknąć w StreetComplete, wysokość tam jest wystarczająca. Zaraz poprawię. |
|
| 148281743 | Chyba bug w najnowszej wersji SCEE |
|
| 143691046 | > private=yes → Shouldn’t it be access=private instead? Most probably, yes. When using pic4review, though, I don't work with raw tags, the interface is very simple (and pretty limiting at that). > For clarity, how about using another tag to put this date? I fully agree. This tag was put automatically by Pic4Review, maybe it'd be a good idea to make a ticket at https://framagit.org/Pic4Carto/Pic4Review |
|
| 137465295 | I'd argue this changeset is worse than useless; using a space is more readable *and* correct. |
|
| 137200772 | Chyba trzeba to zgłosić na repo https://wiki.openstreetmap.orgdata.link, znowu złapał nie ten element co trzeba dziesiątki kilometrów dalej… |
|
| 125253229 | Well then, they should be given a 0-day block so they have to read a message sent to them |
|
| 125253229 | Hey there, please don't add non-existent features. I've reverted your changes. |
|
| 124016671 | Hey there, please don't add non-existent features. Those bus stops were already mapped in correct places. I've reverted your changes. |
|
| 123957585 | Hey there, please don't add non-existent features. Those bus stops were already mapped in correct places. I've reverted your changes. |
|
| 125397028 | Sorry for the large BBOX, I thought RevertUI would create separate reverts for each changeset |
|
| 75325432 | Oh right, thanks for noticing it, I meant "not correct". |
|
| 121094295 | Z jakiego źródła alternatywna nazwa Tarnawki? I raczej w tagu alt_name powinno być, a nie w nawiasach na moje oko. |
|
| 115122844 | Sorry for large BBOX, it seems the map selected a wrong node, I'll fix it |
|
| 114147113 | Thank you, I'll make sure to check for such errors more thoroughly next time. |
|
| 114147113 | And it's weird that the validator didn't complain about overlapping buildings and highways, do you know why that may be the case? |