Are these names signposted or are you making them up? Why are you tagging the paths as cycleways and naming them Walkway - this is an obvious contradiction. If walkways where cycling is allowed they should be tagged as highway=footway with bicycle=permissive. You have recently made many similar edits and many have been commented on - please respond to these comments. OSM is a community effort.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106069732

Why have you tagged way/173225434 with layer=-1?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106066282

How can this be a cycleway if it is named ....Walkway?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106066913

Why is way/951827070 tagged with layer=-1?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106065081

Does this source have a licence compatible with OSM?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105952583

Why are you naming this walkway and tagging as a
cycleway?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105959695

Seconded, makes no sense to be named Adams Walkway and tagged as a cycleway
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105954239

Please use meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105946879

Please use meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105947001

Why is way/951850890 tagged as layer -1 is it really underneath other mapped objects? Also rather than drawing sidewalks separately consider adding sidewalk tags to the parent roads, it is much easier to maintain and generally the preferred option in NZ
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105937929

These are not access=private, it should be customer
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105915115

Please do not use the name field to tag descriptions like "informal crossing area" - osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105903084

Please see amenity=retirement_home and osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth on how to properly tag retirement villages and planned developments
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105802127

Please dont put made up names like "a path through" in the name field : osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105603953

Please use meaningful comments on changesets

Correction - Henderson, not Te Atatu South

You've tagged this as a turning_circle (highway=turning_circle) but described it as a roundabout - they aren't the same. If truely a roundabout it should be tagged as a mini_roundabout (highway=mini_roundabout) or drawn and tagged as a full roundabout (junction=roundabout)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104853350

Please use meaningful changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Also if this is a vaccination centre then the tags used seem wrong, see healthcare=vaccination_centre
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104539155

Please use changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104414691

Can you please use meaningful changeset comments?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104386065