OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
96030844

Rather than adding sidewalks as seperate ways the preference in NZ is to add a sidewalk=left|right|both to the assocaited road way. This makes maintaining consistent topolotgy a lot easier. See sidewalk=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96030844

95022314

Thanks for fixing
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95022314

93451880

Can you please point out an additional source (online, photo, business registration etc) that confirms this business name and location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93451880

95892694

This does not appear to be the actual name of the business, please use the name tag for actual names only. Also please look at the wiki (osm.wiki/) for guidance of the format for opening hours and phone number as these are not correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95892694

95869328

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One thing - as well as changing the highway tag to cycleway you should also remove construction=cycleway. Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95869328

94757272

Yes, that sounds correct

95782577

Some of the footways are tagged with layer=-1 but they are visible in aerial imagery. Please see layer=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95782577

95733146

Thanks, for replying. Not sure how to revert in Id but JOSM has a revert tool. Otherwise just move the new node back to the original position.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95733146

95733146

Why have you moved Flax Point? The original location matches the LINZ Topo 50 maps
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95733146

91733907

The restaurant exists already, you may have been using an old map
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91733907

95644198

Is that genuinely the name of the shop or your opinion?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95644198

95629178

Why are you coalescing all of the reidential areas into one large area that includes the roads? This is not the pattern generally used in NZ where residential areas are split at roads.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95629178

95595814

Stop adding "Church of Pedophilia" this is vandalism
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95595814

95593515

Again, this is vandalism, stop
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95593515

95532904

This appears to be vandalism, please revert
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532904

95532686

This appears to be vandalism, please revert
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532686

95532529

This appears to be vandalism, please revert
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532529

95444535

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally the preferred way to map sidewalks in NZ is to add sidewalk tags to the associated road as per osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_refinement_to_a_highway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95444535

95443923

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. You have changed the wagiing on way/328914342 to building=no. Are you trying to indicate there is no building there? If so the correct way is to remove the way itself rather than change the tagging. Alternatively if it is just not a building then the tagging should be changed to refelect what it is
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95443923

95443869

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. When adding pgone numbers please use ITU-T E.164 format as per phone=*#Usage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95443869