Thanks for the edit. The city tag is not required (and not used in the LINZ imports) as it can be derived from the fact that the node lised within the boundary of the city. The LINZ ref should not be added if the node is not imported from LINZ as it is used to tie imported data back to the source so it can be maintained. I.e. you did everything right, thanks.

Do you have a source for this?

I have removed this, please don't use OSM to map fantasy elements

Review: Edit looks good to me, thanks

No problems, thanks for fixing

Hi, you've managed to create this building as two seperate areas with a split down the middle which doesn't seem to match the aerial imagery. Also most buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners. In ID the command "Square" (shortcut key: Q) will make the angles 90 degrees.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Just one thing to note, there was already an existing node with the address information for 12 Easton Way. You could have merged that with the building outline instead of creating duplicate information for number 12.

This changeset also placed kerbs accross street ways etc. Reverted by changeset/73257261.

Please do not create fake buildings and please use meaningful comments for you changes

Review: Is this really a footway that is visible on the ground or just a shortcut accross the grass? It appears to be the latter in the aerial imagery. If it is just a short cut please dont map it as a footway - maybe (if at all) use highway=path and trail_visibilty=no

Review: Looks good to me

As per Auckland Council, Lumsden Green is actually a park, can you please put the tag back? See https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?panel=gallery&suggestField=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmapspublic.aklc.govt.nz%2Farcgis%2Frest%2Fservices%2FLiveMaps%2FParkAssetPublic%2FMapServer%2F42

Please don't delete ways that are private, instead tag them as "access=private" this stops them getting added again and routers will not route people through them. Also you edit deleted the park/reserve - this is sourced from the Auckland Council data (https://data-aucklandcouncil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/02f8f2fea2224b70896122de4d1943fe_42) and visible on the aerial imagery, can you please restore it. Thanks

Fixed by Rudy355

Buildings tidied

I have corrected the tagging

Can you please use more descriptive changeset comments instead of just a generic "relaigned'? See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for guidelines. Thanks

This changeset has resulted in strange text being added to the lanes:forward tag of way/621305758

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A couple of review points: the building outlines you have drawn are quite approximate, if you use the ESRI aerial imagery instead of bing it may be clearer and you can make the buildings more accurate. The buildings to should also be "squared" to use 90 degree angles, this can be accessed in the Id editor by right clicking on the way or using the "Q" short cut key.

Please undo your changes to the Te Whau pathway - the way it was tagged is correct for a planned/proposed cycleway. What you have done effectively replaces it with an open footway - very misleading. See highway=proposed