Hi wlecome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Do you have a verifiable source for your changes? I ask because you have added a park that does not appear in the Auckland Council park extents data set and appears from aerial imagery to in fact be private land. Thanks, Rob.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. A pointer: in the ID editor you can right click and select "SQUARE" (Shortcut 'Q') to set all the building angles to 90 degrees which is generally correct for many NZ buildings.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Just a couple of points: please don't put descriptions like "playground" in the name field (see name=*). In this case you could create a seperate area tagged with lesiure=playground. Also can you please use more descriptive changeset comments (see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments).
Thanks.

Thanks for the quick response, I'll edit the tags.

This path (and various others) is tagged as access=no and foot=yes which is contradictory, is it open to the public to walk?

Both graphhopper and OSRM are routing correctly so the underlying data looks fine now: osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=-36.87474%2C174.73495%3B-36.87500%2C174.73520

Updated buildinbg outline

No response so I've undone this at it appears to be vandalism

I've changed tagging as per my suggestions

Changed back to swimming pool by james2185

What app/router are you using that is attempting to route over the train tracks? I ask because the edits you have made are being flagged as wrong by QA checkers such as OSMOSE and from my understanding shouldn't be required. Thanks.

REVIEW: Hi welcome to OSM, thanks for your edit, it looks good to me. A couple of improvements you could make: instead of the description field you could put "Kowhai Forge Ltd." in the name tag and add a "craft=blacksmith" tag

Deleted by james2185

Do you have a source for this? From the aerial it does not appear to be a park and the name seems suspicious as well.

Can I ask what the source for this name is? It looks like naming an individuals house based on their name which is not good practice. Thanks.

Why have you changed this from a swimming pool to a pond? From the aerial imagery it definitely appears to be a pool. Also please use desciptive changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please don't use OSM to map fantasy or joke elements

What is your source for these changes? They do not appear to be supported by aerial imagery and your changeset description gives no information on the change or it's source.

please don't change the names to reflect fantasy elements and please use descriptive comments on your changesets.

That should have been "lies" not "lised"