Welcome to OSM and thanks for the correction. Looks fine to me.

Hi, thanks for adding the walkway but I don't think this should be tagged as footway=crossing and crossing=zebra (see crossing=*)

Whoops XXX should have been layer=* above.

My reading of XXX and bridge=* is that double bridging is actually the correct way to tag. Is my interpretation wrong? OSMose is also flagging this as wrong: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=18&lat=-36.900635&lon=174.715112&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=4110&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=

Further looking at this it seems to be a partial duplicate of an existing Abattoir Lane (zoom right in and you can see both). Needs to be cleaned up

Correct way to handle a private road would be to add access=private as per access=*

Changeset description is wrong - this was scrub not Forest

Comment should have been "Remove tags from outer way of multiploygon"

LINZ imports were originally discussed staring 17/08/12 on the imports list. The imports have been going on intermittently since this time as tracked through http://linz2osm.openstreetmap.org.nz/workslices/list/?ws_state=&dataset=&layer=river_cl&user=&order_by=checked_out_at
Documentation is at osm.wiki/New_Zealand_data_import_projects

Arggh, thought I'd re-connected JOSM with my interactive account. This was not an import.

Michael, LINZ importing is covered at osm.wiki/LINZ. There is nothing specific to river imports there though. I was not aware of the need for a dedicated account for import, will try and clear that up with the people overseeing the LINZ import.
Cheers, Rob.